Inquiry in question
| Abstract | What follows is the transcript of an inquiry which takes itself as its object: an inquiry into its own inquiry. It opens out of a mere marking of its questioning, `?', and proceeds by questioning that mark, and the progress of its inquiry as transcription of something `open' into marks and questions - such transcription itself marked as only one thing open to the `writer'. Each successive attempt to transcribe into words the opening transition into `words', `text', `book', from some textually marked `context' in which the transition is open, simply leads into a questioning of each such attempted transcription, the bringing of its terms `into question'. The first section of the inquiry closes having marked out an internal `logical' space and time of these opening questions, coordinated around the initial question of marking a question: so many `dimensions' of lines of questioning `question' - in particular the external `physical' dimension of a `space' and `time' in which marking or transcription is (physically) open, and a `poetic' or figural dimension in which that `external' physical open-ness or space provides, like the `internal' logical space of logical, physical and poetic questions, and `image' for those three coordinate dimensions in whose textual and contextual interplay their transcription into a logical space and time of questions is open | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
James Somerville (2001). Time and Interrogative Logical Form. Philosophy 76 (1):55-75.
Leena Kakkori (forthcoming). Education and the Concept of Time. Educational Philosophy and Theory.
James W. Comman (1964). Linguistig Frameworks and Metaphysical Questions. Inquiry 7 (1-4):129 – 142.
Timothy L. S. Sprigge (1966). The Common‐Sense View of Physical Objects. Inquiry 9 (1-4):339-373.
Richmond Campbell & Jennifer Woodrow (2003). Why Moore's Open Question is Open: The Evolution of Moral Supervenience. Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (3):353-372.
Richmond Campbell & Jennifer Woodrow (2003). Why Moore's Open Question is Open: The Evolution of Moral Supervenience. Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (3):353-372.
Michel Meyer (ed.) (1988). Questions and Questioning. W. De Gruyter.
Peter Forrest (1995). Is Space-Time Discrete or Continuous? — An Empirical Question. Synthese 103 (3):327--354.
William Hare (2004). Open-Minded Inquiry. Inquiry 23 (3):37-41.
Antonio Montalbán (2011). Open Questions in Reverse Mathematics. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 17 (3):431-454.
Nader El-Bizri (2004). On Και Χωρα. Studia Phaenomenologica 4 (1-2):73-98.
Ned Markosian (2000). What Are Physical Objects? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):375-395.
Joseph Diekemper (2005). Logical Determinateness, Fixity, and the Symmetry of Time. Philosophical Papers 34 (1):1-24.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-01-10Total downloads2 ( #232,628 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |

