Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):680-681 (2000)
|Abstract||The finding of a correlation between normative responses to judgment and reasoning questions and cognitive capacity measures (SAT score) suggests that the cause of the non-normative responses is computational in nature. This actually is consistent with the rational competence view. The implications of this finding for the adaptation view of cognition are discussed.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Shira Elqayam & Jonathan Evans (2011). Subtracting “Ought” From “Is”: Descriptivism Versus Normativism in the Study of Human Thinking. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 34 (05):251-252.
Maria Miceli & Cristiano Castelfranchi (2001). Acceptance as a Positive Attitude. Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):112 – 134.
Carole J. Lee (2008). Applied Cognitive Psychology and the "Strong Replacement" of Epistemology by Normative Psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):55-75.
David Sloan Wilson (1990). Species of Thought: A Comment on Evolutionary Epistemology. Biology and Philosophy 5 (1):37-62.
S. Davies (2010). Why Art Is Not a Spandrel. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (4):333-341.
Leigh Van Valen (2009). How Ubiquitous is Adaptation? A Critique of the Epiphenomenist Program. Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):267-280.
David Hardman (2000). The Understanding/Acceptance Principle: I Understand It, but Don't Accept It. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):677-678.
Mathieu Beirlaen, Christian Straßer & Joke Meheus (2013). An Inconsistency-Adaptive Deontic Logic for Normative Conflicts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):285-315.
Mark Bickhard (2002). The Process Dynamics of Normative Function. The Monist 85 (1):3-28.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )
How can I increase my downloads?