David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 44 (4):405 – 432 (2001)
To the extent they have adopted a cafeteria-style approach to Nietzsche's trademark conceptions, kneading and molding his words into chimerical constructs, postmodernist philosophers inevitably remind us of Zarathustra's description of 'scholars': 'They work like mills and like stamps: throw down your seed-corn to them and they will know how to grind it small and reduce it to white dust' ( TSZ , II, 16). If so, how much significance might we attribute to any postmodernist's 'findings' of any textual nuances in Nietzsche's relativism and stylistic multiplicity - nuances which at one moment appear intimately to apply and at the next to be hopelessly impertinent to whatever point that postmodernist is straining to make? The answer ought to be clear: By maintaining that there exist no intrinsically privileged vantage platforms vis-à-vis any text whatever, postmodernists in effect subvert their own analyses, and thus leave every work they consider unaffected. In that sense, we should be on target to advance that postmodernists are, au fond , engaged in writing for the sake of writing; indeed, what delivers them from sheer irrelevance is nothing but their clamorous advocacy of universal egalitarianism. This, however, necessarily reaffirms the nature and hankerings of the 'race' of the last man, and thus perverts the teleological direction of Nietzsche's aesthetics. Those who regard postmodernism as a regressive movement must therefore attempt to set the record straight by arguing that Nietzsche's relativism is, in fact, only a means to the eventual (phenomenal) realization of his Übermensch idea.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jacques Derrida (1978). Writing and Difference. University of Chicago Press.
Jacques Derrida (2004). Positions. Continuum.
Michel Foucault & Paul Rabinow (1984). The Foucault Reader. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Jacques Derrida (1982). Margins of Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Julian Young (1992). Nietzsche's Philosophy of Art. Cambridge University Press.
James Magrini (2009). Truth, Art, and the “New Sensuousness”: Understanding Heidegger's Metaphysical Reading of Nietzsche. Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):116-138.
Tom Stern (2008). Nietzsche on Context and the Individual. Nietzscheforschung 15:299-315.
Werner Stegmaier & Lisa Marie Anderson (2009). After Montinari: On Nietzsche Philology. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 38 (1):5-19.
Ted Sadler (1995). Nietzsche: Truth and Redemption: Critique of the Postmodernist Nietzsche. Athlone Press.
Daniel T. O'Hara (2009). The Art of Reading as a Way of Life: On Nietzsche's Truth. Northwestern University Press.
Ashley Woodward (2002). Nihilism and the Postmodern in Vattimo's Nietzsche. Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 6:51-67.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #177,510 of 1,796,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,527 of 1,796,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?