Gunderson and Searle: A common error about artificial intelligence
Southwest Philosophical Studies 28:28-34 (1989)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||Artificial Intelligence Science Gunderson, K Searle, J|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eldon C. Wait (2006). What Computers Could Never Do. In Analecta Husserliana: The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research, Volume Xd:Artificial Intelligence;Experience;Premise;Searle, John R. Dordrecht: Springer.
J. M. Whitmer (1983). Intentionality, Artificial Intelligence, and the Causal Powers of the Brain. Auslegung 10:194-210.
Dale Jacquette (1990). Fear and Loathing (and Other Intentional States) in Searle's Chinese Room. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):287-304.
J. Christopher Maloney (1987). The Right Stuff. Synthese 70 (March):349-72.
Andrew Ward (1989). Radical Interpretation and the Gunderson Game. Dialectica 43 (3):271-280.
Tracy B. Henley (1990). Natural Problems and Artificial Intelligence. Behavior and Philosophy 18 (2):43-55.
Kevin Warwick (2002). Alien Encounters. In Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Georges Rey (2003). Searle's Misunderstandings of Functionalism and Strong AI. In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
John Mark Bishop (2003). Dancing with Pixies: Strong Artificial Intelligence and Panpsychism. In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?