Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (1):49-75 (2002)
|Abstract||It is widely believed that the Divine Command Theory is untenable due to the Euthyphro Dilemma. This article first examines the Platonic dialogue of that name, and shows that Socrates’s reasoning is faulty. Second, the dilemma in the form in which many contemporary philosophers accept it is examined in detail, and this reasoning is also shown to be deficient. This is not to say, however, that the Divine Command Theory is true—merely that one popular argument for rejecting it is unsound. Finally, some brief thoughts are presented concerning where the real problems lie for the theory.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Linda Zagzebski (1998). The Virtues of God and the Foundations of Ethics. Faith and Philosophy 15 (4):538-553.
Derrick Farnell (2005). God and Morality. Think 4 (10):43-52.
Michael J. Harris (2003). Divine Command Ethics: Jewish and Christian Perspectives. Routledgecurzon.
Lenn E. Goodman (2011). Ethics and God. Philosophical Investigations 34 (2):135-150.
Scott Hill (2010). Richard Joyce's New Objections to the Divine Command Theory. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (1):189-196.
Nicholas Unwin (2008). Divine Hoorays: Some Parallels Between Expressivism and Religious Ethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3):659-684.
Gary R. Mar (1987). What Euthyphro Couldn't Have Said. Faith and Philosophy 4 (3):241-261.
Christian Miller (forthcoming). The Euthyphro Dilemma. In Blackwell International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Blackwell.
Stephen J. Sullivan (1993). Robert Adams's Theistic Argument From the Nature of Morality. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (2):303 - 312.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads128 ( #3,650 of 548,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,091 of 548,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?