Graduate studies at Western
Hypatia 14 (2):72 - 96 (1999)
|Abstract||Drawing Wittgenstein's and Irigaray's philosophies into conversation might help resolve certain misunderstandings that have so far hampered both the reception of Irigaray's work and the development of feminist praxis in general. A Wittgensteinian reading of Irigaray can furnish an anti-essentialist conception of "woman" that retains the theoretical and political specificity feminism requires while dispelling charges that Irigaray's attempt to delineate a "feminine" language is either groundlessly utopian or entails a biological essentialism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Anne van Leeuwen (2010). Sexuate Difference, Ontological Difference: Between Irigaray and Heidegger. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):111-126.
Claire Colebrook (1997). Feminist Philosophy and the Philosophy of Feminism: Irigaray and the History of Western Metaphysics. Hypatia 12 (1):79 - 98.
Dorothea Olkowski (2000). The End of Phenomenology: Bergson's Interval in Irigaray. Hypatia 15 (3):73-91.
Diana J. Fuss (1989). "Essentially Speaking": Luce Irigaray's Language of Essence. Hypatia 3 (3):62 - 80.
Kate Ince (1996). Questions to Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 11 (2):122 - 140.
Karen Green (2002). The Other as Another Other. Hypatia 17 (4):1-15.
Alison Stone (2006). Luce Irigaray and the Philosophy of Sexual Difference. Cambridge University Press.
Lynda Haas (1993). Review: Of Waters and Women: The Philosophy of Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Hypatia 8 (4):150 - 159.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads2 ( #246,694 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?