David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 48 (2):132 - 151 (2003)
The 1962 publication of J. H. Waszink's edition of Calcidius' commentary on Plato's "Timaeus" focussed attention on the question of Calcidius' source for a group of chapters where he presents an interpretation of Plato's account of the creation of soul. I discuss three attempts to answer this question: that of Waszink himself, who argues that the source is Porphyry who was here influenced by the Neopythagorean/Platonist Numenius, that of J. M. Van Winden, who claims Numenius as the direct source, and that of Werner Deuse, who offers reasons for excluding Numenius as either directly or indirectly responsible. I show the weakness of Deuse's critique, but then argue that neither Waszink nor Van Winden has given sufficient consideration to the possibility that Plotinus, either alone or through Porphyry as intermediary, is behind Calcidius' interpretation, where the doctrines of the unity of the soul and of a higher soul that does not descend, both characteristic of Plotinus' psychology, are prominent. However, there is an important but uniformly overlooked feature of this exegesis that rules out both Plotinus and Porphyry as possible sources. This leaves Numenius as the only serious candidate. If, then, the origin of the doctrines of the unity of the soul and of the undescended higher soul can be traced to the work of Numenius, there is the strong possibility that in his formulation of these same doctrines Plotinus was indebted to Numenius
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A. A. Long (1975). Calcidius J. Den Boeft: Calcidius on Fate: His Doctrine and Sources. (Philosophia Antiqua, Xviii.) Pp. 146. Leiden: Brill, 1970. Paper, Fl.28. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 25 (01):52-54.
Wendy Elgersma Helleman (2010). Plotinus and Magic. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (2):114-146.
Gretchen J. Reydams-Schils (2006). Calcidius on the Human and the World Soul and Middle-Platonist Psychology. Apeiron 39 (2):177 - 200.
Gretchen J. Reydams-Schils (2007). Meta-Discourse: Plato's Timaeus According to Calcidius. Phronesis 52 (3):301-327.
J. den Boeft (ed.) (1970). Calcidius on Fate. Leiden,Brill.
Teun Tieleman (1998). Plotinus on the Seat of the Soul: Reverberations of Galen and Alexander in "Enn." IV, 3 , 23. Phronesis 43 (4):306-325.
Denis O'Brien (1999). La matière chez Plotin: son origine, sa nature. Phronesis 44 (1):45 - 71.
Denis O'Brien (1999). La matière chez Plotin: son origine, sa nature. Phronesis 44 (1):45-71.
J. C. M. van Winden (1959). Calcidius on Matter. Leiden, E. J. Brill.
John Phillips (2003). Numenian Psychology in Calcidius? Phronesis 48 (2):132-151.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #326,358 of 1,934,420 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,207 of 1,934,420 )
How can I increase my downloads?