David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 113 (3):323 - 346 (1997)
This work examines whether the environmentally-induced decoherence approach in quantum mechanics brings us any closer to solving the measurement problem, and whether it contributes to the elimination of subjectivism in quantum theory. A distinction is made between 'collapse' and 'decoherence', so that an explanation for decoherence does not imply an explanation for collapse. After an overview of the measurement problem and of the open-systems paradigm, we argue that taking a partial trace is equivalent to applying the projection postulate. A criticism of Zurek's decoherence approach to measurements is also made, based on the restriction that he must impose on the interaction between apparatus and environment. We then analyze the element of subjectivity involved in establishing the boundary between system and environment, and criticize the incorporation of Everett's branching of memory records into the decoherence research program. Sticking to this program, we end by sketching a proposal for 'environmentally-induced collapse'.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Osvaldo Pessoa (1997). Can the Decoherence Approach Help to Solve the Measurement Problem? Synthese 113 (3):323-346.
Osvaldo Pessoa Jr (1997). Can the Decoherence Approach Help to Solve the Measurement Problem? Synthese 113 (3):323-346.
Hanneke Janssen, Reconstructing Reality: Environment-Induced Decoherence, the Measurement Problem, and the Emergence of Definiteness in Quantum Mechanics.
Andrew Elby (1994). The 'Decoherence' Approach to the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:355 - 365.
Richard Healey (1995). Dissipating the Quantum Measurement Problem. Topoi 14 (1):55-65.
L. S. (2003). Why Decoherence has Not Solved the Measurement Problem: A Response to P.W. Anderson. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (1):135-142.
Olimpia Lombardi, Sebastian Fortin & Mario Castagnino (2012). The Problem of Identifying the System and the Environment in the Phenomenon of Decoherence. In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), Epsa Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer 161--174.
Mario Castagnino & Olimpia Lombardi (2005). Self-Induced Decoherence and the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):764-776.
Amit Hagar (2007). Experimental Metaphysics2: The Double Standard in the Quantum-Information Approach to the Foundations of Quantum Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (4):906-919.
David Wallace (2008). The Quantum Measurement Problem: State of Play. In Dean Rickles (ed.), The Ashgate Companion to Contemporary Philosophy of Physics. Ashgate
Thomas Breuer (1996). Subjective Decoherence in Quantum Measurements. Synthese 107 (1):1 - 17.
Guido Bacciagaluppi & Meir Hemmo (1994). Making Sense of Approximate Decoherence. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:345 - 354.
Meir Hemmo (2003). Remarks on the Direction of Time in Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1458-1471.
P. N. & Robin Reuvers (2013). A Flea on Schrödinger's Cat. Foundations of Physics 43 (3):373-407.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads54 ( #82,811 of 1,934,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,405 of 1,934,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?