David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
AI and Society 10 (2):199-217 (1996)
Design of information systems, on the one hand, is often dominated by pure technical considerations of performance, correctness or reliability. On the other hand, sociological analysis of the social impact of information technology is not transfered to operationalised design criteria and to practice. The paper discusses this contradiction and tries to overcome the gap between computer science and social sciences in design by analysing the history of design in architecture and fine arts as well as the approaches of contemporary design-oriented disciplines. Based on this analysis and on the broad discussion about human-centredness, foundations of a new Design Science are outlined. Consequences for the education of computer scientists and software designers are discussed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
J. Martin Corbett (1998). Reconstructing Human-Centred Technology: Lessons From the Hollywood Dream Factory. [REVIEW] AI and Society 12 (3):214-230.
Similar books and articles
Harold Salzman (1991). Engineering Perspectives and Technology Design in the United States. AI and Society 5 (4):339-356.
Peter Purgathofer (2006). Is Informatics a Design Discipline? Poiesis and Praxis 4 (4):303-314.
Greg Bamford (1991). Design, Science and Conceptual Analysis. In Jim Plume (ed.), Architectural Science and Design in Harmony: Proceedings of the joint ANZAScA / ADTRA conference, Sydney, 10-12 July, 1990. School of Architecture, University of NSW.
John Broadbent (2002). Design and Sociocultural Evolution: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. World Futures 58 (2 & 3):213 – 228.
Mary L. Cummings (2006). Integrating Ethics in Design Through the Value-Sensitive Design Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):701-715.
Greg Bamford (2003). Research, Knowledge and Design. In Clare Newton, Sandra Kaj-O'Grady & Simon Wollan (eds.), Design + Research: Project Based Research in Architecture. Second International Conference of the Association of Australasian Schools of Architecture, Melbourne 28 – 30 September, 2003. Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia.
Philippe D’Anjou (2010). Toward an Horizon in Design Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):355-370.
Michael Hampe & Silke Lang (eds.) (2009). The Design of Material, Organism, and Minds: Different Understandings of Design. Springer.
Ulrich Krohs (2009). Functions as Based on a Concept of General Design. Synthese 166 (1):69-89.
Sahotra Sarkar (2011). The Science Question in Intelligent Design. Synthese 178 (2):291 - 305.
R. Codinhoto, Lj Koskela, P. Tzortzopoulos & M. Kagioglou, How Analysis and Synthesis Have Been Understood in Design.
William Dembski (2006). In Defence of Intelligent Design. In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oup Oxford. 715-731.
Ulrich Krohs (2008). Co-Designing Social Systems by Designing Technical Artifacts. In Pieter E. Vermaas, Peter Kroes, Andrew Light & Steven A. Moore (eds.), Philosophy and Design: From Engineering to Architecture. Springer.
Jeffry L. Ramsey (1993). When Reduction Leads to Construction: Design Considerations in Scientific Methodology. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (3):241 – 253.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads4 ( #272,063 of 1,139,993 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #157,514 of 1,139,993 )
How can I increase my downloads?