Philosophical Review 109 (4):483-523 (2000)
|Abstract||In Mind and World, John McDowell argues against the view that perceptual representation is non-conceptual. The central worry is that this view cannot offer any reasonable account of how perception bears rationally upon belief. I argue that this worry, though sensible, can be met, if we are clear that perceptual representation is, though non-conceptual, still in some sense 'assertoric': Perception, like belief, represents things as being thus and so.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jacob Beck (2012). The Generality Constraint and the Structure of Thought. Mind 121 (483):563-600.
Robert Stalnaker (2003). What Might Nonconceptual Content Be? In York H. Gunther (ed.), Essays on Nonconceptual Content. MIT Press.
Adrian Cussins (2003). Content, Conceptual Content, and Nonconceptual Content. In York H. Gunther (ed.), Essays on Nonconceptual Content. MIT Press.
Richard G. Heck Jr (2000). Nonconceptual Content and the "Space of Reasons". Philosophical Review 109 (4):483 - 523.
Ingar Brinck (1999). Nonconceptual Content and the Distinction Between Implicit and Explicit Knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):760-761.
York H. Gunther (2001). Content, Illusion, Partition. Philosophical Studies 102 (2):185-202.
Michael Tye (2005). On the Nonconceptual Content of Experience. Schriftenreihe-Wittgenstein Gesellschaft.
Jeff Speaks (2005). Is There a Problem About Nonconceptual Content? Philosophical Review 114 (3):359-98.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads263 ( #644 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #5,982 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?