'This inscrutable principle of an original organization': Epigenesis and 'looseness of fit' in Kant's philosophy of science
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):73-109 (2003)
Kant's philosophy of science takes on sharp contour in terms of his interaction with the practicing life scientists of his day, particularly Johann Blumenbach and the latter's student, Christoph Girtanner, who in 1796 attempted to synthesize the ideas of Kant and Blumenbach. Indeed, Kant's engagement with the life sciences played a far more substantial role in his transcendental philosophy than has been recognized hitherto. The theory of epigenesis, especially in light of Kant's famous analogy in the first Critique (B167), posed crucial questions regarding the 'looseness of fit' between the constitutive and the regulative in Kant's theory of empirical law. A detailed examination of Kant's struggle with epigenesis between 1784 and 1790 demonstrates his grave reservations about its hylozoist implications, leading to his even stronger insistence on the discrimination of constitutive from regulative uses of reason. The continuing relevance of these issues for Kant's philosophy of science is clear from the work of Buchdahl and its contemporary reception.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John H. Zammito (2012). The Lenoir Thesis Revisited: Blumenbach and Kant. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (1):120-132.
Andrew Janiak (2004). Kant as Philosopher of Science. Perspectives on Science 12 (3):339-363.
Patrick Frierson (2008). Empirical Psychology, Common Sense, and Kant's Empirical Markers for Moral Responsibility. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):473-482.
Similar books and articles
Horst Pfeiffle (2008). On the Psychogenesis of the a Priori: Jean Piaget's Critique of Kant. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (5):487-498.
Richard Dean (2006). The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory. Oxford University Press.
James Van Cleve (1999). Problems From Kant. Oxford University Press.
Kevin Thompson (2001). Kant's Transcendental Deduction of Political Authority. Kant-Studien 92 (1):62-78.
N. Jardine (2003). Hermeneutic Strategies in Gerd Buchdahl's Kantian Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):183-208.
Michelle Grier (2001). Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge University Press.
John H. Zammito (2008). Kant's "Naturalistic" History of Mankind? Some Reservations. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (1):29-62.
Susan Neiman (1994). The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant. Oxford University Press.
Eugenio Moya (2005). Epigénesisy Validez: EI Papel de la Embriología En El Programa Transcendental de Kant (Epigenesis and Validity: The Role of the Embriology in Kant's Transcendental Program). Theoria 20 (2):143-166.
John H. Zammito (2003). 'This Inscrutable Principle of an Original Organization': Epigenesis and 'Looseness of Fit' in Kant's Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):73-109.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #147,771 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?