David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):701 - 727 (2011)
Abstract According to Habermas' colonization thesis, reification is a social pathology that arises when the communicative infrastructure of the lifeworld is 'colonized' by money and power. In this paper I argue that, thirty years after the publication of the Theory of Communicative Action, this thesis remains compelling. However, while Habermas offers a functionalist explanation of reification, his normative criticism of it remains largely implicit: he never explains what is wrong with reification from the perspective of the people whose social relations are reified. As a result, Habermas cannot explain why only some forms of colonization lead to reification effects. In particular, he suggests that reification effects result from the juridification of communicatively structured domains of action but not from the commodification of labour power. I criticize this argument and suggest that if the normative dimension of the colonization thesis is made explicit, a more nuanced explanation of reification becomes possible
|Keywords||Jürgen Habermas Georg Lukács Reification Commodification Lifeworld System|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Asher Horowitz (1998). 'Like a Tangled Mobile': Reason and Reification in the Quasi-Dialectical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (1):1-23.
Titus Stahl (2011). Verdinglichung als Pathologie zweiter Ordnung. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 59 (5):731-746.
Timo Jütten (2010). What is Reification? A Critique of Axel Honneth. Inquiry 53 (3):235-256.
A. Chari (2010). Toward a Political Critique of Reification: Lukacs, Honneth and the Aims of Critical Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (5):587-606.
Harry F. Dahms (1997). Theory in Weberian Marxism: Patterns of Critical Social Theory in Lukacs and Habermas. Sociological Theory 15 (3):181-214.
George Hull (2013). Reification and Social Criticism. Philosophical Papers 42 (1):49 - 77.
James Robinson, Reification and Hegemony : The Politics of Culture in the Writings of Georg Lukács and Antonio Gramsci, 1918-1938.
Axel Honneth (2008). Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. Oxford University Press.
Nythamar De Oliveira (2012). Heidegger, Reification and Formal Indication. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 4 (1):35 - 52.
Guido Starosta (2003). Scientific Knowledge and Political Action: On the Antinomies of Lukács' Thought in "History and Class Consciousness". Science and Society 67 (1):39 - 67.
Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther (2009). Character Analysis in Cladistics: Abstraction, Reification, and the Search for Objectivity. Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1-2):129-162.
Italo Testa (2007). Criticism From Within Nature: The Dialectic Between First and Second Nature From McDowell to Adorno. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (4):473-497.
Axel Honneth (2008). Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea (Tanner Lectures). Oxford University Press.
B. J. Brown (1987). Shibboleths of Law: Reification, Plain-English, and Popular Legal Symbolism. Legal Research Foundation.
Added to index2011-12-15
Total downloads192 ( #19,802 of 1,940,952 )
Recent downloads (6 months)51 ( #7,530 of 1,940,952 )
How can I increase my downloads?