David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 17 (3):245-260 (2011)
In this paper I try to illuminate the Rawlsian architectonic through an interpretation of what Rawls’ Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy say about Rousseau. I argue that Rawls’ emphasis there when discussing Rousseau on interpreting amour-propre so as to make it compatible with a life in at least some societies draws attention to, and helps explicate, an analogous feature of his own work, the strains of commitment broadly conceived. Both are centrally connected with protecting a sense of self which is vital for one’s own agency. This allows us to appreciate better than much of the literature presently does the requirement for Rawls that justice and the good are congruent, that a society of justice does not disfigure citizens’ ability to live out lives relatively unmarked by relations of domination. Some comments on G. A. Cohen’s critiques of Rawls are made
|Keywords||Rawls Rousseau Amour-propre Finality Publicity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Harvard University Press.
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
John Rawls (2009/2005). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press 133-135.
Samuel Richard Freeman (2007). Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
N. J. H. Dent (1998). Rousseau on Amour-Propre: N.J.H. Dent. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):57–74.
N. J. H. Dent & Timothy O'Hagan (1999). Rousseau on "Amour-Propre". Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99:91 - 107.
Timothy O'Hagan (1999). Rousseau on Amour-Propreon Six Facets of Amour-Propre. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):91–107.
Pauline Chazan (1993). Rousseau as Psycho-Social Moralist: The Distinction Between Amour De Soi and Amour-Propre. History of Philosophy Quarterly 10 (4):341 - 354.
Patrice Canivez (2008). The Legislator's Educative Task In Rousseau's Political Theory. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 40:15-21.
Megan J. Laverty (2011). Can You Hear Me Now? Jean-Jacques Rousseau on Listening Education. Educational Theory 61 (2):155-169.
Pablo Muchnik (2000). An Essay on the Principles of Rousseau's Anthropology. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2):51-77.
Helga Varden (2010). G. A. Cohen's Rescuing Justice and Equality - A Critical Engagement. Social Philosophy Today 26:175-189.
Frederick Neuhouser (2008). Rousseau's Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition. Oxford University Press.
Niko Kolodny (2010). The Explanation of Amour-Propre. Philosophical Review 119 (2):165-200.
Kevin W. Gray (2012). Rawls and the Problem of Honour. Philosophia 40 (2):213-222.
Jake Greenblum (2010). Distributive and Retributive Desert in Rawls. Journal of Social Philosophy 41 (2):169-184.
David A. Reidy (2004). Rawls on International Justice: A Defense. Political Theory 32 (3):291-319.
Jonathan Wolff (2001). John Rawls. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):347-361.
Added to index2011-05-03
Total downloads130 ( #19,243 of 1,727,294 )
Recent downloads (6 months)40 ( #28,554 of 1,727,294 )
How can I increase my downloads?