David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Levinas Studies 2:153-173 (2007)
In a certain respect, one can say that Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics, as asserted mainly in Totality and Infinity and Otherwise than Being, but also partially in Existence and Existents and Time and the Other, constitutes a rebuttal of Benedict de Spinoza’s Ethics. Levinas offers a succinct account of his thinking on this issue in Totality and Infinity, at the end of a section called “Separation and the Absolute,” which concludes the first part of the book “The Self and the Other”: “Thought and freedom come to us from separation from the consideration of the Other — this thesis is at the antipodes of Spinozism” (TI 105). In all likelihood,what has provoked him at such a moment would have to be Spinoza’s pretense to reach the infinite by means of understanding, while for him, Levinas, the essence of created existence consists in its separation from the Infinite (in other words, as especially his later philosophy begins to make clear, from “God”). Let us nonetheless begin with the question itself: Why this intolerance toward Spinoza?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
F. Scott Scribner (2002). Extending Spinoza… For the Love of God! International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):151-160.
Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2011). Why Spinoza is Not an Eleatic Monist (Or Why Diversity Exists). In Philip Goff (ed.), Spinoza on Monism. Palgrave
April Capili (2011). The Created Ego in Levinas' Totality and Infinity. Sophia 50 (4):677-692.
Christina M. Gschwandtner (2007). The Neighbor and the Infinite: Marion and Levinas on the Encounter Between Self, Human Other, and God. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):231-249.
Robert Bernasconi (2005). No Exit: Levinas' Aporetic Account of Transcendence. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):101-117.
Barbara Jane Davy (2007). An Other Face of Ethics in Levinas. Ethics and the Environment 12 (1):39-66.
Theodorus de Boer (1997). The Rationality of Transcendence: Studies in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. J.C. Gieben.
Jacob Meskin (2007). The Role of Lurianic Kabbalah in the Early Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. Levinas Studies 2:49-77.
Joseph Lawrence (2007). Schelling and Levinas. Levinas Studies 2:175-196.
Robyn Horner (2000). Emmanuel Levinas on God and Philosophy. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (1):41-46.
Tina Chanter (2001). Time, Death, and the Feminine: Levinas with Heidegger. Stanford University Press.
Ohad Nachtomy (2011). A Tale of Two Thinkers, One Meeting, and Three Degrees of Infinity: Leibniz and Spinoza (1675–8). British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):935-961.
C. Fred Alford (2004). Levinas and Political Theory. Political Theory 32 (2):146-171.
Emmanuel Levinas (1969). Totality and Infinity. Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads16 ( #225,602 of 1,796,328 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #206,830 of 1,796,328 )
How can I increase my downloads?