David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (11) (2003)
Glock’s most recent book is a critical examination of the views of Quine and Davidson. One of the novel features of the book that will prove helpful to most readers is Glock’s comparative treatment of the two. Glock not only thoroughly articulates their views, he also points out significant differences between their basic assumptions and between the goals driving their various projects. For example, Glock compares Quine’s ’radical translation’ project with Davidson’s ’radical interpretation’ project, pointing out interesting differences in assumptions and purposes. Another unusual feature of the book is that Glock is himself fundamentally at odds with both Quine and Davidson, and holds views that are broadly Witttgensteinian. Thus, unlike most extant books on Quine and Davidson, Glock’s strives to make manifest various weaknesses of their arguments and views, rather than to show how they can be salvaged from what would appear to be devastating criticisms. However, while fundamentally critical, Glock’s book is not particularly polemical. He clearly and forcefully presents the views that he criticizes and defends positions of his protagonists from criticisms that he takes to be off-target or unfair.
|Keywords||Donald Davidson W.V. Quine|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andrew Chignell (2004). Review: Glock (Ed.), Strawson and Kant. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (8).
Hans-Johann Glock (2008). What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge University Press.
Robert Sinclair (2009). Why Quine is Not an Externalist. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:279-304.
H. G. Callaway (1993). Review of Evnine, Donald Davidson. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 43 (October):555-560.
Hans-Johann Glock (1995). A Radical Interpretation of Davidson: Reply to Alvarez. Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):206-212.
Roger F. Gibson (1994). Quine and Davidson: Two Naturalized Epistemologists. Inquiry 37 (4):449 – 463.
Gary Kemp, Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality, by Hans- Johann Glock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, . Pp. XVI + . H/B £.. [REVIEW]
Hans-Johann Glock (1993). The Indispensability of Translation in Quine and Davidson. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (171):194-209.
Hans-Johann Glock (2003). Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #196,354 of 1,906,942 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,942 )
How can I increase my downloads?