David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Clinical Ethics 1 (1):33-36 (2006)
The Mental Capacity Act, which received Royal Assent in April 2005, will come into force in April 2007. The Act puts into statute the legality of interventions in relation to adults who lack capacity to make decisions on their own behalf. The aim of this paper is to outline the main features of the legislation and its impact on those health care professionals who provide care and treatment for incapacitated adults. The paper sets out the underlying ethical principles that govern interventions under the Act's powers and briefly explores the legal definition of incapacity and the process by which capacity is assessed. It looks at the governing notion of 'best interests' and at the legal indemnity provided by the Act for interventions that are in the best interests of an incapacitated adult. It contains sections on the Act's main innovations, including research involving incapacitated adults, lasting powers of attorney and the new Court of Protection. It also provides information on advance decisions to refuse treatment
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Lucas (2011). Decision-Making Capacity and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):117-122.
Ajit Shah (2011). The Paradox of the Assessment of Capacity Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):111-115.
S. Fovargue & J. Miola (2011). Assessing and Detaining Those Who Are Mentally Disordered Under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Mental Capacity Act 2005: Part 1. [REVIEW] Clinical Ethics 6 (1):11-14.
Tim Thornton (2011). Capacity, Mental Mechanisms, and Unwise Decisions. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):127-132.
Jules Holroyd (forthcoming). Clarifying Capacity: Reasons and Value. In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Health. Oxford University Press
Ajit Shah (2011). Mental Competence or Best Interests? Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):151-152.
Carolyn Johnston (2007). The Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Advance Decisions. Clinical Ethics 2 (2):80-84.
Natalie F. Banner (2011). The 'Bournewood Gap' and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):123-126.
Martin Sexton (2012). Assessing Capacity to Make Decisions About Long-Term Care Needs: Ethical Perspectives and Practical Challenges in Hospital Social Work. Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (4):411-417.
T. Hope, A. Slowther & J. Eccles (2009). Best Interests, Dementia and the Mental Capacity Act (2005). Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (12):733-738.
Jonathan Parker, Bridget Penhale & David Stanley (2011). Research Ethics Review: Social Care and Social Science Research and the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (4):380-400.
C. Johnston & J. Liddle (2007). The Mental Capacity Act 2005: A New Framework for Healthcare Decision Making. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (2):94-97.
Ajit Shah (2011). The Pragmatic Aspects of Assessing Mental Capacity. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):133-134.
Peter Herissone-Kelly (2010). Capacity and Consent in England and Wales: The Mental Capacity Act Under Scrutiny. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):344-352.
Neelke Doorn (2011). Conceptualization or Assessment: One at a Time or Both? Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):153-155.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads7 ( #423,759 of 1,902,202 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,168 of 1,902,202 )
How can I increase my downloads?