Optimisation of Criminal Procedure: Preconditions and Possibilities for Written Procedure

Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (2):753-769 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Endeavours of politicians, representatives of law enforcement institutions and courts to create simplified, accelerated and less human and time resources requiring legal procedures in criminal cases prompted the authors of this article to assess the possibilities to develop the written form of procedure in Lithuania. The goal of the authors of this article is to assess the origin and goals of the written form of procedure, as well as to define the main rules and points for discussions on the possibilities to develop the written form of procedure in the Lithuanian criminal procedural law. The conclusion is drawn in this article to the effect that written form of procedure is seen as a condition for simplifying and accelerating the legal process, and choosing this form of procedure is not considered as denying or restraining the expectations of participants of criminal procedure towards a fair trial. The analysis provides the basis for the authors to make a conclusion on the appropriate limits of applying written or oral procedures for hearing criminal cases: Oral procedure must be guaranteed in cases where questions of criminal liability and personal guilt are solved at the first instance court hearings; Oral procedure usually has to be guaranteed in cases where during the procedure at the first instance court hearing the questions of criminal liability and personal guilt are solved, although oral procedure may be limited and the procedure may be conducted in written form if new evidence are not investigated and there is no doubt for deciding whether oral procedure is better for understanding the case; Oral procedure need not be guaranteed only in cases where questions of application of the law are solved and if oral procedure was guaranteed during the procedure at the court of first instance; Written procedure may guarantee the right to a fair trial, where the participants of the procedure are allowed to provide various explanations and written documents or a person is allowed to ask for an oral court hearing

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aspiration of the Criminal Procedure – the Truth.Tomas Rudzkis & Artūras Panomariovas - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (2):739-754.
Criminal Procedure Involving the Disabled Persons (text only in German.Jolanta Zajanckauskiene - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 119 (1):331-349.
Tendencies of the Development of the Lithuanian Criminal Procedure Law.Rima Azubalyte - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 119 (1):281-296.
New Insights into the Procedure within a Reasonable Time as a Legal Principle.Raimundas Jurka - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 119 (1):297-316.
Pre-Trial Proceedings in the Czech Republic.Marek Frystak - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 121 (3):251-267.
Completion of Criminal Proceeding within a Reasonable Time in Latvia.Sandra Kaija - 2013 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 20 (2):725-748.
Proportionality: from the Concept to the Procedure.Artūras Panomariovas & Egidijus Losis - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 120 (2):257-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
16 (#880,136)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references