David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (1):75-104 (2005)
In this paper, I make a case for interpreting the Lysis as a dialogue of definition, designed to answer the question of “What is a friend?” The main innovation of my interpretation is the contention – and this is argued for in the paper – that Socrates hints towards a definition of being a friend that applies equally to mutual friendship and one-way attraction – the two kinds of friend relation very clearly identified by Socrates in the dialogue. The key to understanding how the two different kinds of friendship can have a common definition is to appreciate that the property of being a friend has a relational character.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Seahwa Kim (2011). On Gilmore's Definition of 'Dead'. Philosophia 39 (1):105-110.
Mary P. Nichols (2009). Socrates on Friendship and Community: Reflections on Plato's Symposium, Phaedrus, and Lysis. Cambridge University Press.
David Sedley (1989). Is the Lysis a Dialogue of Definition? Phronesis 34 (1):107-108.
Jeffrey Gold (1984). Socratic Definition. Philosophy Research Archives 10:573-588.
David Bolotin (1979). Plato's Dialogue on Friendship: An Interpretation of the Lysis, with a New Translation. Cornell University Press.
Øyvind Rabbås (2004). Definitions and Paradigms: Laches' First Definition. Phronesis 49 (2):143 - 168.
Øyvind Rabbås (2004). Definitions and Paradigms: Laches' First Definition. Phronesis 49 (2):143-168.
T. F. Morris (1985). Plato's Lysis. Philosophy Research Archives 11:269-279.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #90,339 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #42,743 of 1,088,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?