Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (1):75-104 (2005)
|Abstract||In this paper, I make a case for interpreting the Lysis as a dialogue of definition, designed to answer the question of “What is a friend?” The main innovation of my interpretation is the contention – and this is argued for in the paper – that Socrates hints towards a definition of being a friend that applies equally to mutual friendship and one-way attraction – the two kinds of friend relation very clearly identified by Socrates in the dialogue. The key to understanding how the two different kinds of friendship can have a common definition is to appreciate that the property of being a friend has a relational character.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Seahwa Kim (2011). On Gilmore's Definition of 'Dead'. Philosophia 39 (1):105-110.
Øyvind Rabbås (2004). Definitions and Paradigms: Laches' First Definition. Phronesis 49 (2):143-168.
Øyvind Rabbås (2004). Definitions and Paradigms: Laches' First Definition. Phronesis 49 (2):143 - 168.
David Bolotin (1979). Plato's Dialogue on Friendship: An Interpretation of the Lysis, with a New Translation. Cornell University Press.
Jeffrey Gold (1984). Socratic Definition. Philosophy Research Archives 10:573-588.
David Sedley (1989). Is the Lysis a Dialogue of Definition? Phronesis 34 (1):107-108.
Mary P. Nichols (2009). Socrates on Friendship and Community: Reflections on Plato's Symposium, Phaedrus, and Lysis. Cambridge University Press.
T. F. Morris (1985). Plato's Lysis. Philosophy Research Archives 11:269-279.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,445 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?