David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 36 (2):259-275 (2013)
This article investigates the relationship between moral judgments, fallibility, and imaginative insight. It will draw heavily from the canon of classical American philosophy, the members of which (from Ralph Waldo Emerson, to C.S. Peirce, E.L. Cabot, to Jane Addams, to John Dewey) took up this relationship as pivotally important in moral theorizing. It argues that the process of hypothesis formation—characterized as “insight” by Emerson and extended by Peirce in his notion of “abduction”—is a necessary condition of moral progress for it allows individuals to think through the boundaries of social and ethical life. In a world of unexpected occurrences and uncertainty, the ability to generate novel explanatory frameworks and normative ideals is a crucial, if normally underappreciated, moral faculty. This paper attempts to respond to this relative neglect
|Keywords||Ethics Abduction Peirce Fallibility Insight Moral progress|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Singer (1972). Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Charles S. Peirce (1931). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Jaakko Hintikka (2007). Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning. Cambridge University Press.
Bernard Gert (2004). Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Annemarie Kalis (2010). Improving Moral Judgments: Philosophical Considerations. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 30 (2):94-108.
Garrath Williams (2010). 'Who Are We to Judge?' – On the Proportionment of Happiness to Virtue. Philosophy 85 (1):47-66.
Alice Crary (2007). Beyond Moral Judgment. Harvard University Press.
Joachim Widder (1998). The Fallibility of Medical Judgment as a Consequence of the Inexactness of Observations. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 1 (2):119-124.
Andrew Sneddon (2007). A Social Model of Moral Dumbfounding: Implications for Studying Moral Reasoning and Moral Judgment. Philosophical Psychology 20 (6):731 – 748.
Jacqueline L. Reck (2000). Ethics and Budget Allocation Decisions of Municipal Budget Officers. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (4):335 - 350.
Kathleen Wallace (1993). Reconstructing Judgment: Emotion and Moral Judgment. Hypatia 8 (3):61 - 83.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2012). ‘Norm Acquisition, Rational Judgment and Moral Particularism’. Theory and Research in Education 10 (1):3--25.
Jonathan Bennett (1960). Moral Argument. Mind 69 (276):544-549.
Russell Haines, Marc D. Street & Douglas Haines (2008). The Influence of Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue on Moral Judgment, Moral Obligation, and Moral Intent. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2):387 - 399.
Shaun Nichols (2004). After Objectivity: An Empirical Study of Moral Judgment. Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):3 – 26.
Robin Jeshion (2002). The Fallibility of Rational Insight. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:301-310.
Hans Sluga (2008). Wayne Martin on Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):109 - 119.
Added to index2012-11-10
Total downloads12 ( #304,763 of 1,934,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,780 of 1,934,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?