Is the status principle beyond salvation? Toward redeeming an unpopular theory of hell

Sophia 44 (1):91-103 (2005)
In this paper I examine a recent objection to the retributive punishment theory of hell, specifically that the theory entails something obviously false: that it is possible to commit an infinite sin. I defend the moral principle behind one account of infinite sin, a principle referred to as the Status Principle (that other things being equal the higher the status of the offended the party, the more serious the sin). I show that recent objections to this principle are far from conclusive, and that the principle is more plausible than perhaps initially thought.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF02780484
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,570
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
James S. Spiegel (2015). Annihilation, Everlasting Torment, and Divine Justice. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76 (3):241-248.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

21 ( #195,477 of 1,938,536 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #449,299 of 1,938,536 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.