David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (1):61 – 74 (2001)
If one accepts a version of absolutism that excludes the intentional killing of any innocent human person from conception to natural death, ectopic pregnancy poses vexing difficulties. Given that the embryonic life almost certainly will die anyway, how can one retain ones moral principle and yet adequately respond to a situation that gravely threatens the life of the mother and her future fertility? The four options of treatment most often discussed in the literature are non-intervention, salpingectomy (removal of tube with embryo), salpingostomy (removal of embryo alone), and use of methotrexate (MXT). In this essay, I review these four options and introduce a fifth (the milking technique). In order to assess these options in terms of the absolutism mentioned, it will also be necessary to discuss various accounts of the intention/foresight distinction. I conclude that salpingectomy, salpingostomy, and the milking technique are compatible with absolutist presuppositions, but not the use of methotrexate.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lawrence Masek (2006). Deadly Drugs and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Reply to Tully. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):143-151.
Victor Saenz (2014). Bioethics and Disagreement: Organ Markets, Abortion, Cognitive Enhancement, Double Effect, and Other Key Issues in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (3):207-216.
Lawrence Masek (2006). Deadly Drugs and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Reply to Tully. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):143-151.
Similar books and articles
Byron L. Haines (1993). A Critique of Harman's Empiric Relativism. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
John Bolender (2004). Two Accounts of Moral Diversity: The Cognitive Science of Pluralism and Absolutism. [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)] 3.
Shane D. Courtland (2009). A Prima Facie Defense of Hobbesian Absolutism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):419-449.
Robert F. Allen (1998). Absolutism Vs. Relativism in Contemporary Ontology. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:343-352.
Christopher Kaczor (2007). Intention, Foresight, and Mutilation: A Response to Giebel. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):477-482.
Michael Brannigan (2000). Cultural Diversity and the Case Against Ethical Relativism. Health Care Analysis 8 (3):321-327.
Ragnar Francén (2007). Metaethical Relativism: Against the Single Analysis Assumption. Dissertation, University of Gothenburg
T. Lincoln Bouscaren (1944). Ethics of Ectopic Operations. Milwaukee, Wis.,The Bruce Publishing Company.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #117,225 of 1,796,560 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #168,044 of 1,796,560 )
How can I increase my downloads?