Graduate studies at Western
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):353-378 (2004)
|Abstract||In recent years, some controversy has arisen about whether Thomas Aquinas’s commentaries on Aristotle can be read as expressing Aquinas’s own views rather than as simply an interpretation of Aristotle. This article examines the reasons given in favor of the view that the commentaries, in particular the commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, are merely interpretations of Aristotle. Using Thomas’sscripture commentaries, internal evidence, as well as the history of reception, it is concluded that the Sententia libri ethicorum presents Thomas’s own views and not merely his understanding of Aristotle|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tobias Hoffmann (2006). Voluntariness, Choice, and Will in the Ethics Commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas. Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 17:71-92.
Tobias Hoffmann (2008). Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas on Magnanimity. In István Pieter Bejczy (ed.), Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 -1500. Brill.
James Conroy Doig (2001). Aquinas's Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics: A Historical Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, C.
Thomas (1951). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Nature. St. Paul, North Central Pub. Co..
Thomas (1947). The Commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas on Book I of the Physics of Aristotle. [Minneapolis.
Mary M. Keys (2006). Aquinas, Aristotle, and the Promise of the Common Good. Cambridge University Press.
M. W. F. Stone (2001). The Angelic Doctor and the Stagirite: Thomas Aquinas and Contemporary 'Aristotelian' Ethics. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):97–128.
Jörn Müller (2008). In War and Peace : The Virtue of Courage in the Writings of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas. In István Pieter Bejczy (ed.), Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 -1500. Brill.
D. W. Hamlyn (1964). Aquinas on the Phsics St.Thomas Aquinas: Commentary on Aristotle's Physics. Translated by R. J. Blackwell, R. J. Spath, And W. E. Thirlkel, with an Introduction by V. J. Bourke. Pp. Xxxii + 599. London: Routledge, 1963, Cloth, 70s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 14 (03):267-269.
Matthias Lu (1953). Aristotle's De Anima With the Commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas. The New Scholasticism 27 (4):486-489.
John Wippel (2004). Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics. In Jorge J. E. Gracia & Jiyuan Yu (eds.), Uses and Abuses of the Classics: Western Interpretations of Greek Philosophy. Ashgate Pub..
John Inglis (1999). Aquinas's Replication of the Acquired Moral Virtues: Rethinking the Standard Philosophical Interpretation of Moral Virtue in Aquinas. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):3 - 27.
Robert F. O'Toole (1968). Commentary on Saint Paul's Epistle to the Galatians. By St. Thomas Aquinas. Tr. F. R. Larcher, O. P. / Commentary on Saint Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians. By St. Thomas Aquinas. Tr. Matthew L. Lamb. O.C.S.O. [REVIEW] The Modern Schoolman 46 (1):76-77.
R. E. Houser (2011). Aristotle and Two Medieval Aristotelians on the Nature of God. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):355 - 375.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads7 ( #142,429 of 739,345 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,345 )
How can I increase my downloads?