- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Healthy scepticism as an expected-utility explanation of the phenomena of Allais and Ellsberg
Theory and Decision 32 (1):57-64 (1992)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Testing the Intransitivity Explanation of the Allais Paradox.Ebbe Groes, Hans JØrgen Jacobsen, Birgitte Sloth & Torben Tranæs - 1999 - Theory and Decision 47 (3):229-245.
The So-Called Allais Paradox and Rational Decisions Under Uncertainty.Maurice Allais - 1979 - In Maurice Allais & Ole Hagen (eds.), Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. D. Reidel.
Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox.Maurice Allais & Ole Hagen (eds.) - 1979 - D. Reidel.
On the Application of Multiattribute Utility Theory to Models of Choice.Jeffrey Helzner - 2009 - Theory and Decision 66 (4):301-315.
A Process Approach to the Utility for Gambling.Marc Le Menestrel - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (3):249-262.
E-Capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox.Jürgen Eichberger & David Kelsey - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (2):107-138.
Expected utility and risk.Paul Weirich - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):419-442.
Consequentialism and rational choice: Lessons from the Allais paradox.Bruno Verbeek - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):86–116.
Distinguishing indeterminate belief from “risk-averse” preferences.Katie Steele - 2007 - Synthese 158 (2):189-205.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-01-04
Downloads
46 (#338,714)
6 months
1 (#1,516,429)
2013-01-04
Downloads
46 (#338,714)
6 months
1 (#1,516,429)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The empirical adequacy of cumulative prospect theory and its implications for normative assessment.Glenn W. Harrison & Don Ross - 2017 - Journal of Economic Methodology 24 (2):150-165.
How Much Ambiguity Aversion? Finding Indifferences between Ellsberg's Risky and Ambiguous Bets.Ken Binmore, Lisa Stewart & Alex Voorhoeve - 2012 - Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 45 (3):215-38.
Eliciting ambiguity aversion in unknown and in compound lotteries: a smooth ambiguity model experimental study.Giuseppe Attanasi, Christian Gollier, Aldo Montesano & Noemi Pace - 2014 - Theory and Decision 77 (4):485-530.
The role of intuition and reasoning in driving aversion to risk and ambiguity.Jeffrey V. Butler, Luigi Guiso & Tullio Jappelli - 2014 - Theory and Decision 77 (4):455-484.
Expected utility for decision making with subjective models.Salvatore Modica - 1995 - Theory and Decision 39 (2):157-168.
References found in this work
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.D. Kahneman & A. Tversky - 1979 - Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:263--291.
Le Comportement de L’Homme Rationnel Devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de L’École Américaine.Maurice Allais - 1953 - Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 21:503--546.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo