Edwin D. Mares, relevant logic—a philosophical interpretation
Studia Logica 85 (3) (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEdwin D. Mares (2000). Ce is Not a Conservative Extension of E. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (3):263-275.
Edwin Mares (2010). Logic and Metaphysics : Dummett Meets Heidegger. In James Williams (ed.), Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. Continuum.
Edwin D. Mares & Robert K. Meyer (1993). The Semantics Ofr. Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (1):95 - 110.
Edwin D. Mares (2000). The Incompleteness of RGL. Studia Logica 65 (3):315-322.
Edwin D. Mares & André Fuhrmann (1995). A Relevant Theory of Conditionals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (6):645 - 665.
Edwin D. Mares (2004). “Four-Valued” Semantics for the Relevant Logic R. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):327-341.
Edwin D. Mares (1994). Why We Need a Relevant Theory of Conditionals. Topoi 13 (1):31-36.
Edwin D. Mares (1996). Relevant Logic and the Theory of Information. Synthese 109 (3):345 - 360.
Edwin D. Mares (2009). General Information in Relevant Logic. Synthese 167 (2):343 - 362.
Edwin David Mares (2004). Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Interpretation. Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
