David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):27-55 (2012)
Much seems to be at stake in metaphysical questions about, for example, God, free will or morality. One thing that could be at stake is the value of the universe we inhabit—how good or bad it is. We can think of competing philosophical positions as describing possibilities, ways the world might turn out to be, and to which value can be assigned. When, for example, people hope that God exists, or fear that we do not possess free will, they express attitudes towards these possibilities, attitudes that presuppose answers to questions about their comparative value. My aim in this paper is to distinguish these evaluative questions from related questions with which they can be confused, to identify structural constraints on their proper pursuit, and to address objections to their very coherence. Answers to such evaluative questions offer one measure of the importance of philosophical disputes.
|Keywords||Metaphilosophy Value theory Value of philosophy Possibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jason Stanley (2005). Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford University Press.
Robert Nozick (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books.
Timothy Williamson (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Blackwell Pub..
Robert Stalnaker (2003). Ways a World Might Be: Metaphysical and Anti-Metaphysical Essays. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Harrah (1961). A Logic of Questions and Answers. Philosophy of Science 28 (1):40-46.
Eric Metaxas (2005). Everything You Always Wanted to Know About God (but Were Afraid to Ask). Waterbrook Press.
Robin Le Poidevin (1995). Internal and External Questions About God. Religious Studies 31 (4):485-500.
Stephen Stich (2001). Plato's Method Meets Cognitive Science. Free Inquiry 21 (2):36-38.
Christopher Hookway (2008). Questions, Epistemology, and Inquiries. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):1-21.
Matti Sintonen (1984). On the Logic of Why-Questions. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:168 - 176.
Henry Hiz (1907). Questions and Answers. The Classical Review 21 (7):220-220.
James W. Comman (1964). Linguistig Frameworks and Metaphysical Questions. Inquiry 7 (1-4):129 – 142.
Mark Balaguer (2009). The Metaphysical Irrelevance of the Compatibilism Debate (and, More Generally, of Conceptual Analysis). Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):1-24.
Daniel Nolan (2011). The Extent of Metaphysical Necessity. Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):313-339.
Andrzej Wiśniewski (1994). On the Reducibility of Questions. Erkenntnis 40 (2):265-284.
Andrzej Wisniewski (1994). On the Reducibility of Questions. Erkenntnis 40 (2):265 - 284.
Robert Stalnaker (1998). Los Nombres y la Referencia: Semantica y Metasemantica. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):7-19.
Added to index2010-05-17
Total downloads156 ( #22,558 of 1,793,012 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #101,828 of 1,793,012 )
How can I increase my downloads?