Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (3):257-306 (2004)
|Abstract||Kant famously insisted that “the idea of the will of every rational being as a universally legislative will” is the supreme principle of morality. Recent interpreters have taken this emphasis on the self-legislation of the moral law as evidence that Kant endorsed a distinctively constructivist conception of morality according to which the moral law is a positive law, created by us. But a closer historical examination suggests otherwise. Kant developed his conception of legislation in the context of his opposition to theological voluntarist accounts of morality and his engagement with conceptions of obligation found in his Wolffian predecessors. In order to defend important claims about the necessity and immediacy of moral obligation, Kant drew and refined a distinction between the legislation and authorship of the moral law in a way that precludes standard theological voluntarist theories and presents an obstacle to recent constructivist interpretations. A correct understanding of Kant's development and use of this distinction reveals that his conception of legislation leaves little room for constructivist moral anti-realism.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeremy Waldron (1999). The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge University Press.
T. H. Irwin (2011). Continuity in the History of Autonomy. Inquiry 54 (5):442 - 459.
Lara Denis (2006). Kant's Conception of Virtue. In Paul Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Patrick Kain (2006). Constructivism, Intrinsic Normativity, and the Motivational Analysis Argument. In Heiner Klemme, Manfred Kuehn & Dieter Schönecker (eds.), Moralische Motivation. Kant und die Alternativen. (Kant-Forschungen 16). Meiner Verlag.
Patrick Kain (2005). Interpreting Kant's Theory of Divine Commands. Kantian Review 9 (1):128-149.
Pauline Kleingeld (1999). Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development. History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (1):59-80.
Jonathan Webber (2012). A Law Unto Oneself. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246):170-189.
Paul Formosa (forthcoming). Is Kant a Moral Constructivist or a Moral Realist? European Journal of Philosophy.
Matthew Caswell (2006). Kant's Conception of the Highest Good, the Gesinnung, and the Theory of Radical Evil. Kant-Studien 97 (2):184-209.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads71 ( #12,309 of 556,747 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #11,066 of 556,747 )
How can I increase my downloads?