Rome: Centre for Indian and Inter-Religious Studies (1995)
|Abstract||Even as dismissive of pursuing Comparative Philosophy for achieving East-West synthesis in philosophy, the author maintains the need for “open philosophizing.” “Open philosophizing” is one characterized by dialogical openness to culturally diverse philosophical traditions and thought-patterns.|
|Keywords||Comparative Philosophy Indian Philosophy Modern Indian Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Call number||B5134.R34934.K35 1995|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rada Ivekovic & Penelopetr Deutscher (2000). Coincidences of Comparison. Hypatia 15 (4):224-235.
Shayne Clarke (2009). Locating Humour in Indian Buddhist Monastic Law Codes: A Comparative Approach. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 37 (4):311-330.
Rada Iveković (2000). Coincidence of Comparison. Hypatia 15 (4):224 - 235.
P. T. Raju (1964). Indian Epistemology and the World and the Individual. Philosophy East and West 14 (3/4):311-332.
Paulos Gregorios (ed.) (2002). Neoplatonism and Indian Philosophy. State University of New York Press.
Jitendranath Mohanty (1992). Reason and Tradition in Indian Thought: An Essay on the Nature of Indian Philosophical Thinking. Oxford University Press.
Tang Yijie (1983). A Perspective on the Meaning of Comparative Philosophy and Comparative Religion Studies: The Case of the Introduction of Indian Buddhism Into China". Contemporary Chinese Thought 15 (2):39-106.
M. Rafique (1988). Indian and Muslim Philosophy: A Comparative Study. Ashish Pub. House.
P. T. Raju (1978). Self and Body: How Known and Differentiated. The Monist 61 (January):135-155.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #49,760 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?