The trouble with transcendental arguments: Towards a naturalization of Roy Bhaskar's early realist ontology

Journal of Critical Realism 4 (1):28-61 (2005)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1558/jocr.v4i1.28
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,879
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Roy Bhaskar (2007). Theorising Ontology. In Clive Lawson, John Latsis & Nuno Martins (eds.), Contributions to Social Ontology. Routledge
Dan Zahavi (2004). Phenomenology and the Project of Naturalization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):331-47.
Tobin Nellhaus (1998). Signs, Social Ontology, and Critical Realism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28 (1):1–24.
Oskari Kuusela (2008). Transcendental Arguments and the Problem of Dogmatism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
Robert Stern (2007). Transcendental Arguments: A Plea for Modesty. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):143-161.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

19 ( #144,871 of 1,725,168 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #210,933 of 1,725,168 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.