The trouble with transcendental arguments: Towards a naturalization of Roy Bhaskar's early realist ontology

Journal of Critical Realism 4 (1):28-61 (2005)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords ONTOLOGY   META-PHILOSOPHY   BHASKAR   TRANSCENDENTAL ARGUMENT   NATURALISM
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Roy Bhaskar (2007). Theorising Ontology. In Clive Lawson, John Latsis & Nuno Martins (eds.), Contributions to Social Ontology. Routledge.
    Dan Zahavi (2004). Phenomenology and the Project of Naturalization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):331-47.
    Tobin Nellhaus (1998). Signs, Social Ontology, and Critical Realism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28 (1):1–24.
    Oskari Kuusela (2008). Transcendental Arguments and the Problem of Dogmatism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
    Robert Stern (2007). Transcendental Arguments: A Plea for Modesty. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):143-161.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-09-02

    Total downloads

    9 ( #128,736 of 1,088,370 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #42,603 of 1,088,370 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.