Wittgensteinian Fideism Again: A Reply to Hudson

Philosophy 44 (167):63 - 65 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

W. D. Hudson's criticism of some points in my ‘Wittgensteinian Fideism’ are challenging and deserve comment. I remain, however, unconvinced that they require any modification in my assessment of Wittgensteinian Fideism. I shall try to justify this conviction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hudson on receptacles.Timothy Bays - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):569 – 572.
Wittgensteinian fideism.Kai Nielsen - 1982 - In Steven M. Cahn & David Shatz (eds.), International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 191-.
Wittgensteinian fideism? – By Kai Nielsen and D. Z. Phillips.A. Harvevany - 2007 - Philosophical Investigations 30 (3):319–323.
Reply to Parsons, Reply to Heller, and Reply to Rea. [REVIEW]Hud Hudson - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):452-470.
Bayle, Saint-Evremond, and Fideism: A Reply to Thomas M. Lennon.Gianluca Mori - 2004 - Journal of the History of Ideas 65 (2):323-334.
On Two Points against Wittgensteinian Fideism.W. D. Hudson - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (165):269 - 273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
20 (#747,345)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophy of religion in the journals.Robert L. Perkins - 1974 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (3):59-64.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references