A buddhist tract on empiricism
Philosophy East and West 19 (1):65-67 (1969)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBronwyn Finnigan (2011). How Can a Buddha Come to Act?: The Possibility of a Buddhist Account of Ethical Agency. Philosophy East and West 61 (1):134-160.
Jonathan Stoltz (2009). Buddhist Epistemology: The Study of Pramana. Religion Compass 3 (4):537-548.
Alison Gopnik (2009). Could David Hume Have Known About Buddhism? Hume Studies 35 (1/2):5-28.
Charles Goodman (2009). Consequences of Compassion: An Interpretation and Defense of Buddhist Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Kenneth K. Inada (1994). The Buddhist Aesthetic Nature: A Challenge to Rationalism and Empiricism. Asian Philosophy 4 (2):139 – 150.
H. W. Bailey (ed.) (2010). Buddhist Poetry, Thought, and Diffusion. International Academy of Indian Culture and Aditya Prakashan.
Frank J. Hoffman (1982). The Buddhist Empiricism Thesis. Religious Studies 18 (2):151 - 158.
L. M. De Rijk (1966). Some Notes on the Mediaeval Tract de Insolubilibus, with the Edition of a Tract Dating From the End of the Twelfth Century. Vivarium 4 (1):83-115.
David Montalvo (1999). The Buddhist Empiricism Thesis: An Extensive Critique. Asian Philosophy 9 (1):51 – 70.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #134,900 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
