Buddhism and bell hooks: Liberatory Aesthetics and the Radical Subjectivity of No-Self
Hypatia 27 (3):n/a-n/a (2011)
| Abstract | This article engages bell hooks's concept of “radical black subjectivity” through the lens of the Buddhist doctrine of no-self. Relying on the Zen theorist Dōgen and on resources from Japanese aesthetics, I argue that non-attachment to the self clarifies hooks's claim that radical subjectivity unites our capacity for critical resistance with our capacity to appreciate beauty. I frame this argument in terms of hooks's concern that postmodernist identity critiques dismiss the identity claims of disempowered peoples. On the one hand, identity critique has an emotional component, as it involves questioning the self and possibly letting go of aspects of that self in which a person has inevitably made emotional investments. On the other hand, it has an aesthetic component, as it opens a space for the creative crafting and recrafting of identity. Japanese aesthetics emphasizes that all aesthetic appreciation is accompanied by feelings of mournfulness, for the object of aesthetic appreciation is transient. Linking hooks's liberatory aesthetics with the resources of the Japanese tradition suggests that mournfulness in the face of self-loss necessarily accompanies all instances of critical resistance. Thus non-attachment becomes a useful framework in which to understand both the emotional and aesthetic components of empowered identity critique | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNatalie Alexander (1992). Review: Piecings From a Second Reader. [REVIEW] Hypatia 7 (2):177 - 187.
Jennifer Mcmahon Railey (1997). Dependent Origination and the Dual-Nature of the Japanese Aesthetic. Asian Philosophy 7 (2):123 – 132.
Valentine Moulard-Leonard (2011). Moving Beyond Us and Them? Marginality, Rhizomes, and Immanent Forgiveness. Hypatia 27 (3):n/a-n/a.
James Winchester (2000). Understanding Aesthetic Judgments Across Cultural Borders: Bell Hooks, Kant, and Cornel West and the Understanding of Aesthetic Judgments of Others. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):499-525.
Malcolm Budd (1996). The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3):207-222.
Bell Hooks (2010). The Oppositional Gaze : Black Female Spectators. In Marc Furstenau (ed.), The Film Theory Reader: Debates and Arguments. Routledge.
Steven G. Smith (2009). Hooks. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (3):311-319.
L. Dujardin & T. Duriez (1995). A Mathematical Model for the Shape of the Hooks of Cestodae. Acta Biotheoretica 43 (3).
Robin James (2011). "Feminist Aesthetics, Popular Music, and the Politics of the 'Mainstream'". In L. Ryan Musgrave (ed.), Feminist Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art. Springer.
Steve Odin (1991). The Japanese Concept of Nature in Relation to the Environmental Ethics and Conservation Aesthetics of Aldo Leopold. Environmental Ethics 13 (4):345-360.
Kim Q. Hall (2003). Book Review: Bell Hooks. Where We Stand: Class Matters. New York and London: Routledge 2000. [REVIEW] Hypatia 18 (2):233-236.
Toshihiko Izutsu (1981). The Theory of Beauty in the Classical Aesthetics of Japan. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.
Tom Sparrow (2011). Plasticity and Aesthetic Identity; or, Why We Need a Spinozist Aesthetics. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 40:53-74.
Andrew Bowie (2003). Aesthetics and Subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche. Manchester University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-09-16Total downloads15 ( #78,782 of 551,105 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,105 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
