Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):63-74 (2013)
|Abstract||To determine whether fish welfare matters morally, we need to know what characteristics or capacities beings need to have in order to be morally considerable, and whether fish have such characteristics. In this paper I discuss a group of theories, Kantian practical reasoning theories, in which agency (or practical rationality) is traditionally thought to be a necessary condition for moral considerability. An individual must have quite sophisticated capacities to be a (moral) agent in such theories: she must be able to act on rational principles. It seems unlikely that nonhuman animals such as fish have such capacities. I argue, however, that on the basis of certain Kantian arguments, moral agents have reason to accept duties to nonrational animals if they are agents in a much less demanding sense: if they are motivated to pursue the objects of their desires. If fish have this capacity, their welfare matters morally|
|Keywords||Animal ethics Kantian moral theory Agency Practical reason Fish|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Saara Kupsala, Pekka Jokinen & Markus Vinnari (2013). Who Cares About Farmed Fish? Citizen Perceptions of the Welfare and the Mental Abilities of Fish. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):119-135.
Bernice Bovenkerk & Franck L. B. Meijboom (2013). Fish Welfare in Aquaculture: Explicating the Chain of Interactions Between Science and Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):41-61.
Karianne Kalshoven & Franck L. B. Meijboom (forthcoming). Sustainability at the Crossroads of Fish Consumption and Production Ethical Dilemmas of Fish Buyers at Retail Organizations in The Netherlands. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Bernice Bovenkerk & Franck L. B. Meijboom (2012). The Moral Status of Fish. The Importance and Limitations of a Fundamental Discussion for Practical Ethical Questions in Fish Farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):843-860.
Jenny Bergqvist & Stefan Gunnarsson (2013). Finfish Aquaculture: Animal Welfare, the Environment, and Ethical Implications. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):75-99.
Benjamin Hale (2006). The Moral Considerability of Invasive Transgenic Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (4).
Thomas E. Hill (2002). Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Temple Grandin (2010). The Importance of Measurement to Improve the Welfare of Livestock, Poultry and Fish. In Temple Grandin (ed.), Improving Animal Welfare: A Practical Approach. Cab International.
F. L. B. Meijboom & B. Bovenkerk (2013). Fish Welfare: Challenge for Science and Ethics—Why Fish Makes the Difference. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):1-6.
Paul Shapiro (2006). Moral Agency in Other Animals. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
A. Dionys de Leeuw (1996). Contemplating the Interests of Fish: The Angler's Challenge. Environmental Ethics 18 (4):373-390.
Lara Denis (2008). Animality and Agency: A Kantian Approach to Abortion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):117-37.
Anthony F. Beavers, Between Angels and Animals: The Question of Robot Ethics, or is Kantian Moral Agency Desirable?
Temple Grandin (2010). Improving Livestock, Poultry, and Fish Welfare in Slaughter Plants with Auditing Programs. In Temple Grandin (ed.), Improving Animal Welfare: A Practical Approach. Cab International.
Dennis R. Cooley (2007). A Kantian Moral Duty for the Soon-to-Be Demented to Commit Suicide. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):37 – 44.
Added to index2012-02-06
Total downloads14 ( #83,183 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,303 of 549,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?