David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Political Theory 32 (3):320-346 (2004)
There is much disagreement among many commentators of Hannah Arendt's work about whether her contributions to politics and philosophy contain a clandestine version of decisionism or, by contrast, represent an explicit attempt to break away from the elements of voluntarism, arbitrariness, and irrationality, which are considered to be inherent to any theory of the decision. Despite the many disagreements that set apart these two interpretations of Arendt, however, there is a common presupposition that both share. They are in agreement concerning the decision: it is a threat and a vice, intrinsically dangerous and potentially totalitarian in nature, which ought to be expelled from any theory of politics with a normative content. As a result, the terms of the debate pertain solely to whether Arendt was a (crypto-) decisionist and not to the nature and evaluation of the decision as such. This paper argues, contrary to Arendt's critics, that although elements of a theory of the decision can be found scattered throughout many of her writings, she was nonetheless unswerving in her opposition to decisionism. But unlike her defenders, it also argues that had Arendt built on these elements to elaborate a systematic theory of the decision, she would have avoided many of the flaws and inconsistencies that plague her concept of politics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
George Steinmetz (2009). The New Aesthetic-Political Avant-Garde: Linda Zerilli's Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom. [REVIEW] Sociological Theory 27 (1):85 - 89.
Similar books and articles
Irving Louis Horowitz (2012). Hannah Arendt: Radical Conservative. Transaction Publishers.
Simon Swift (2009). Hannah Arendt. Routledge.
Roger Berkowitz (ed.) (2010). Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. Fordham University Press.
Ron H. Feldman (2010). The Pariah as Rebel : Hannah Arendt's Jewish Writings. In Roger Berkowitz, Jeffrey Katz & Thomas Keenan (eds.), Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. Fordham University Press
Phillip Birger Hansen (1993). Hannah Arendt: Politics, History and Citizenship. Stanford University Press.
Amy Allen (1999). Solidarity After Identity Politics: Hannah Arendt and the Power of Feminist Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (1):97-118.
Michael Halberstam (2001). Aestheticism, or Aesthetic Approach, in Arendt and Heidegger on Politics. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:219-232.
Leon Botstein (2010). Liberating the Pariah : Politics, the Jews, and Hannah Arendt. In Roger Berkowitz, Jeffrey Katz & Thomas Keenan (eds.), Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. Fordham University Press
Seyla Benhabib (2010). Hannah Arendt's Political Engagements. In Roger Berkowitz, Jeffrey Katz & Thomas Keenan (eds.), Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. Fordham University Press
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #105,569 of 1,790,511 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #270,682 of 1,790,511 )
How can I increase my downloads?