David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 43 (2):193-206 (2010)
Does the Buddhist doctrine of no-self imply, simply put, no-other? Does this doctrine necessarily come into conflict with an ethics premised on the alterity of the other? This article explores these questions by situating Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics in the context of contemporary Japanese philosophy. The work of twentieth-century Japanese philosopher Watsuji Tetsurō provides a starting point from which to consider the ethics of the self-other relation in light of the Buddhist notion of emptiness. The philosophy of thirteenth-century Zen Master Dōgen casts doubt on Watsuji’s commitment to reciprocal self-other relationality, showing that the idea of self-emptiness disrupts any conventional understanding of reciprocity and promotes instead other-oriented compassion. Despite interesting similarities between the ethics of alterity and Buddhist compassion, a Buddhist-influenced understanding of alterity differs from Levinas on important points, by making possible the claim that all others—human, animal, plant, and mineral—are ethical others
|Keywords||Alterity Buddhism Comparative philosophy Ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Bernasconi & David Wood (eds.) (1988). The Provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the Other. Routledge.
Vrinda Dalmiya (2001). Particularizing the Moral Self: A Feminist Buddhist Exchange. [REVIEW] Sophia 40 (1):61-72.
Emmanuel Levinas (1969). Totality and Infinity. Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nick Smith (2008). Questions for a Reluctant Jurisprudence of Alterity. In Desmond Manderson (ed.), Essays on Levinas and Law: A Mosaic. Palgrave Macmillan.
Matthieu Dubost (2006). Emmanuel Lévinas et la méthode de l'altérité. Studia Phaenomenologica 6:31-58.
Kris Sealey (2011). The Primacy of Disruption in Levinas Account of Transcendence. Research in Phenomenology 40 (3):363-377.
Diane Perpich (2008). The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford University Press.
Paul Standish (2007). Education for Grown-Ups, a Religion for Adults: Scepticism and Alterity in Cavell and Levinas. Ethics and Education 2 (1):73-91.
Alphonso Lingis (2004). Theoretical Paradox and Practical Dilemma. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (1):21 – 28.
William Edelglass (2006). Levinas on Suffering and Compassion. Sophia 45 (2):43-59.
Jack Reynolds (2002). Merleau-Ponty, Levinas, and the Alterity of the Other. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 6 (1):63-78.
Ming Lim (2007). The Ethics of Alterity and the Teaching of Otherness. Business Ethics 16 (3):251–263.
Georg W. Bertram (2006). Die Idee der Philosophie von Emmanuel Lévinas. Studia Phaenomenologica 6:241-260.
Added to index2010-06-19
Total downloads72 ( #20,042 of 1,102,995 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,928 of 1,102,995 )
How can I increase my downloads?