Man and nature: Toward a middle path of survival

Environmental Ethics 8 (4):371-380 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I highlight the philosophical standpoints of two traditions, one from the East and the other from the West, that seem to avoid any form of reductionism resulting from the search for ultimate objectivity in human knowledge and understanding. I compare the pragmatic teachings of the Buddha and William James in order to show how both accommodate the human perspective as an inalienable part of the philosophical enterprise, and, further, how these perspectives contribute to their humanistic approaches and to the valuing of the environment in a way that is essential for human survival

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The early buddhist notion of the middle path.David J. Kalupahana - 1980 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 7 (1):73-90.
Knowledge versus survival.Herman Tennessen - 1973 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):407 – 414.
Philosophical aspects of dual use technologies.Svitlana V. Pustovit & Erin D. Williams - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):17-31.
Ideology and Life in the Idea.Eric Manton - 2007 - Studia Phaenomenologica 7:89-96.
The elusiveness of human nature.Michael Smithurst - 1990 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):433 – 445.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
28 (#555,203)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references