Graduate studies at Western
Analysis 68 (298):133–143 (2008)
|Abstract||CHANGE SLIDE Go through outline of talk CHANGE SLIDE It is my sincerest hope that if there is one thing that people take away from Moral Fictionalism, it is the recognition that standard noncognitivism involves a syndrome of three, logically distinct claims. Standard noncognitivists claim that moral judgment is not belief or any other cognitive attitude but is, rather, a noncognitive attitude more akin to desire; that this noncognitive attitude is expressed by our public moral utterances; and, hence, that our public moral utterances lack a distinctively moral subject matter and so are not answerable to the moral facts. Notice, however, that these are logically distinct claimsthe rst is a psychological claim, the second and third, positive and negative semantic claims, respectively. We can regiment the familiar technical vocabulary as follow: CHANGE..|
|Keywords||ethics metaethics fictionalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Mark Eli Kalderon (2008). M Oral Fictionalism , Summary. Philosophical Books 49 (1).
Mark Eli Kalderon (2005). Moral Fictionalism. Oxford University Press.
Daniel Nolan, Greg Restall & Caroline West (2005). Moral Fictionalism Versus the Rest. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):307 – 330.
Zed Adams (2006). Mark Eli Kalderon, Moral Fictionalism:Moral Fictionalism. Ethics 117 (1):131-135.
Matthew Chrisman (2008). A Dilemma for Moral Fictionalism. Philosophical Books 49 (1):4-13.
Graham Oddie & Dan Demetriou (2007). The Fictionalist's Attitude Problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (5):485 - 498.
Matti Eklund (2009). The Frege–Geach Problem and Kalderon's Moral Fictionalism. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):705-712.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads75 ( #13,471 of 749,219 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,924 of 749,219 )
How can I increase my downloads?