David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Zygon 44 (1):169-196 (2009)
I offer a critical exposition and reconstruction of Michael Oakeshott's views on natural science. The principal aim is to enrich Oakeshott's modal schema by throwing light on it in terms of its internal consistency and by bringing to bear on it recent developments in philosophy in general and the philosophy of science in particular. The discussion brings out the special place reserved for philosophy, the crucial tenet of the separateness of these modes seen as Leibnizian monads as well as the special status allowed to science. It considers the possibility of combining one moment of philosophical thinking, namely ethics, with science in the midst of such modal separateness. I first offer a general introduction of how to approach Oakeshott's views on science. The next section stresses philosophy and its relation to science. This is followed by an elaboration of what the modes of experience are meant to be and how science is placed among them. An examination of Oakeshott's more particular views on science concludes the essay.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
F. H. Bradley (1893/1969). Appearance and Reality. Clarendon Press.
Dorothy Emmett & Michael Oakeshott (1963). Rationalism in Politics, and Other Essays. Philosophical Quarterly 13 (52):283.
Ian Hacking (1991). A Tradition of Natural Kinds. Philosophical Studies 61 (1-2):109-26.
Ian Hacking (2007). Natural Kinds: Rosy Dawn, Scholastic Twilight. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82 (61):203-239.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Corey Abel (2011). Oakeshott’s Wise Defense: Christianity as A Civilization. In The Meanings of Michael Oakeshott's Christianity.
Mark T. Mitchell (2001). Michael Polanyi and Michael Oakeshott. Tradition and Discovery 28 (2):23-34.
Leslie Marsh (2009). Introduction to Oakeshott Symposium. Zygon 44 (1):133-137.
Steven Anthony Gerencser (2000). The Skeptic's Oakeshott. St. Martin's Press.
Corey Abel (forthcoming). Whatever It Turns Out To Be: Oakeshott on Aesthetic Experience. In Leslie MArsh Paul Franco (ed.), Whatever It Turns Out To Be: Oakeshott on Aesthetic Experience. Penn State UP.
Leslie Marsh (2005). Constructivism and Relativism in Oakeshott. In Corey Abel & Timothy Fuller (eds.), In The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott. Imprint Academic.
Stephen Turner (2003). Tradition and Cognitive Science: Oakeshott’s Undoing of the Kantian Mind. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (1):53-76.
Efraim Podoksik (ed.) (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Oakeshott. Cambridge University Press.
Elizabeth Corey (2009). Religion and the Mode of Practice in Michael Oakeshott. Zygon 44 (1):139-151.
Added to index2009-02-20
Total downloads5 ( #324,832 of 1,696,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #342,645 of 1,696,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?