The origin and expansion of kulturpessimismus: The relationship between public and private spheres in early twentieth century germany
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 5 (2):150-164 (1987)
A radical critique of modernity crystallized in the German Bildungsburgertum at the end of the last century. A broad cross-section of this stratum equated "mass democracy" with anarchy, foresaw a future populated only by "atomized modern men," and disdained the "vulgarity" of industrial capitalism. The origin and expansion of the intense and persistent configuration of cultural values that constituted German Kulturpessimismus deserves exploratory theoretical examination. The sociology of knowledge analysis suggested here is based on a Weberian framework that examines the cultural values indigenous to several sectors of the public sphere in pre-industrial and nineteenth century Germany and the particular dynamic of interaction between these values and those indigenous to the private sphere in early twentieth century Germany. Comparisons to the American public sphere and its relationship to the American private sphere are noted in order to isolate clearly the German situation. This case study offers an illustration of the manner in which heterogenous cultural values may persist over extended periods of time despite fundamental structural transformation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Arash Abizadeh (2013). Publicity, Privacy, and Religious Toleration in Hobbes's Leviathan. Modern Intellectual History 10 (2):261-291.
A. W. Carus (2007). Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Joan B. Landes (ed.) (1998). Feminism, the Public and the Private. Oxford University Press.
David Willmer (2002). Parsis and Public Space in 19th Century Bombay: A Different Formulation of 'the Political' in a Non-European Context. Critical Horizons 3 (2):277-298.
David Randall (2011). The Prudential Public Sphere. Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (3):205-226.
Mathew A. Foust (2008). Perplexities of Filiality: Confucius and Jane Addams on the Private/Public Distinction. Asian Philosophy 18 (2):149 – 166.
Codruţa Cuceu (2011). Milestones in the Critique of the Public Sphere: Dewey and Arendt. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):99-110.
Krishan Kumar & Ekaterina Makarova (2008). The Portable Home: The Domestication of Public Space. Sociological Theory 26 (4):324 - 343.
Hsin-I. Liu (2006). The Impossibility of the Public. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #157,093 of 1,101,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #58,870 of 1,101,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?