Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Does context and context-dependence belong to the research agenda of semantics - and, specifically, of formal semantics? Not so long ago many linguists and philosophers would probably have given a negative answer to the question. However, recent developments in formal semantics have indicated that analyzing natural language semantics without a thorough accommodation of context-dependence is next to impossible. The classification of the ways in which context and context-dependence enter semantic analysis, though, is still a matter of much controversy and some of these disputes are ventilated in the present collection. This book is not only a collection of papers addressing context-dependence and methods for dealing with it: it also records comments to the papers and the authors' replies to the comments. In this way, the contributions themselves are contextually dependent. In view of the fact that the contributors to the volume are such key figures in contemporary formal semantics as Hans Kamp, Barbara Partee, Reinhard Muskens, Nicholas Asher, Manfred Krifka, Jaroslav Peregrin and many others, the book represents a quite unique inquiry into the current activities on the semantics side of the semantics/pragmatics boundary.
|Keywords||Semantics Context (Linguistics Focus (Linguistics Discourse analysis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$206.75 new (24% off) $226.65 used (17% off) $245.95 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||P325.5.C65.C647 2004|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
Christine Bartels, Acoustic Correlates of 'Second Occurrence'focus: Towards an Experimental Investigation.
Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof & Frank Veltman, Coreference and Modality in Multi-Speaker Discourse.
H. Kamp & A. Roßdeutscher, Comments on Kaplan's “Demonstratives” and Zimmermann's “Tertiumne Datur? Possessive Pronouns and the Bipartition of the Lexicon”.
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Lyons (1995). Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.) (2011). Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. De Gruyter Mouton.
G. Preyer (ed.) (2007). Context Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. Oxford University Press.
Itamar Francez (2010). Context Dependence and Implicit Arguments in Existentials. Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (1):11-30.
François Récanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftalí Villanueva (eds.) (2010). Context-Dependence, Perspective and Relativity. Mouton de Gruyter.
Ernest Lepore & Herman Cappelen (2005). Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Blackwell Pub..
Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.) (2007). Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Claudia Bianchi (1999). Three Forms of Contextual Dependence. In Paolo Bouquet (ed.), Modeling and Using Context. Second International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT '99, Trento, Italy, September 9-11, 1999, Proceedings. Springer.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?