Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 89 (2):273 - 281 (1991)
|Abstract||Theoretical determinism, as it is usually ascribed to Laplace, is neither verifiable nor falsifiable and has therefore no real content. It is not the same as predictability of actually observable phenomena. On the other hand, predictability is not an abstract principle; rather it is true to a certain degree, depending on the phenomena considered. It can be discussed only by examining the scientific state of affairs. This is done in some detail for classical statistical mechanics. Much of a recently published debate on determinism (Amsterdamski et al. 1990) is thereby obviated.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
D. J. O'Connor (1957). Determinism and Predictability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (28):310-315.
A. Kukla (1980). Determinism and Predictability: Reply to Dieks. Philosophy of Science 47 (1):131-133.
G. M. K. Hunt (1987). Determinism, Predictability and Chaos. Analysis 47 (3):129 - 133.
Bernard Berofsky (1971). Determinism. Princeton University Press.
Frank B. Dilley (1969). Predictability and Free Will. International Philosophical Quarterly 9 (June):205-213.
Stefan Rummens & Stefaan E. Cuypers (2010). Determinism and the Paradox of Predictability. Erkenntnis 72 (2):233 - 249.
Richard Boyd (1972). Determinism, Laws, and Predictability in Principle. Philosophy of Science 39 (4):431-450.
Robert C. Bishop (2003). On Separating Predictability and Determinism. Erkenntnis 58 (2):169--88.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #81,761 of 722,951 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,951 )
How can I increase my downloads?