David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):5 – 14 (2005)
This article examines arguments concerning enhancement of human persons recently presented by Michael Sandel (2004). In the first section, I briefly describe some of his arguments. In section two, I consider whether, as Sandel claims, the desire for mastery motivates enhancement and whether such a desire could be grounds for its impermissibility. Section three considers how Sandel draws the distinction between treatment and enhancement, and the relation to nature that he thinks each expresses. The fourth section examines Sandel's views about parent/child relations and also how enhancement would affect distributive justice and the duty to aid. In conclusion, I briefly offer an alternative suggestion as to why enhancement may be troubling and consider what we could safely enhance.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Nozick (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books.
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1990). The Realm of Rights. Harvard University Press.
Seana Valentine Shiffrin (1999). Wrongful Life, Procreative Responsibility, and the Significance of Harm. Legal Theory 5 (2):117-148.
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1999). Physician‐Assisted Suicide: Two Moral Arguments. Ethics 109 (3):497-518.
T. M. Scanlon (2000). Intention and Permissibility, I. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):301–317.
Citations of this work BETA
Matthew K. Wynia, Emily E. Anderson, Kavita Shah & Timothy D. Hotze (2011). “Doctor, Would You Prescribe a Pill to Help Me…?” A National Survey of Physicians on Using Medicine for Human Enhancement. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (1):3 - 13.
Daniel M. Hausman (2011). A Lockean Argument for Universal Access to Health Care. Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (2):166-191.
S. Matthew Liao (2008). Selecting Children: The Ethics of Reproductive Genetic Engineering. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):973-991.
J. Angelo Corlett, Vincent Brown Jr & Kiersten Kirkland (2012). Coping with Doping. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
J. Angelo Corlett, Vincent Brown Jr & Kiersten Kirkland (2013). Coping with Doping. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
Similar books and articles
Joanna Zylinska (2010). Playing God, Playing Adam: The Politics and Ethics of Enhancement. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (2):149-161.
T. Lewens (2009). Enhancement and Human Nature: The Case of Sandel. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):354-356.
Ruiping Fan (2010). A Confucian Reflection on Genetic Enhancement. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):62 – 70.
J. Robert Loftis (2005). Germ-Line Enhancement of Humans and Nonhumans. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):57-76.
William Gardner (1995). Can Human Genetic Enhancement Be Prohibited? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):65-84.
Richard Twine (2007). Thinking Across Species—a Critical Bioethics Approach to Enhancement. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):509-523.
Thomas Douglas (2008). Moral Enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.
Terrance Mcconnell (2011). Genetic Enhancement and Moral Attitudes Toward the Given. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (4):369-380.
Guy Kahane (2011). Mastery Without Mystery: Why There is No Promethean Sin in Enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (4):355-368.
Michael Fuchs (2010). Reshaping Human Intelligence: The Debate About Genetic Enhancement of Cognitive Functions. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (2):165-181.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads213 ( #13,056 of 1,906,940 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #54,071 of 1,906,940 )
How can I increase my downloads?