Phronesis 54 (3):215-238 (2009)
|Abstract||Contrary to the Aristotelian interpretation of Empedocles' views about cognition, according to which all cognition, like perception, is due to the compositional likeness between subject and object of cognition, this paper argues that when Empedocles says that we know one thing 'by' another (e.g. earth by earth or love by love), he is characterizing analogical reasoning, an intellectual activity quite different from perception (which is explained by the fit between effluences and pores). The paper also explores the idea that strife and love describe, in addition to physical separation and composition, the mental activities of analyzing and composing.|
|Keywords||ANALOGY KNOWLEDGE EMPEDOCLES LOVE THEOPHRASTUS STRIFE|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
F. Solmsen (1965). Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cossnology. Phronesis 10 (2):109-148.
F. Solmsen (1965). Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology. Phronesis 10 (2):109 - 148.
David Farrell Krell (2007). “A Double Tale I Shall Tell . . . ”. Epoché 11 (2):287-304.
David Farrell Krell (2007). “A Double Tale I Shall Tell . . . ”: Empedocles and Hölderlin on Tragic Nature and Tragic Purification. Epoché 11 (2):287-304.
Catherine Osborne (1987). Empedocles Recycled. The Classical Quarterly 37 (01):24-.
Denis O'Brien (2000). Hermann Diels on the Presocratics: Empedocles' Double Destruction of the Cosmos ("Aetius" II 4.8). Phronesis 45 (1):1 - 18.
Denis O'Brien (2000). Hermann Diels on the Presocratics: Empedocles' Double Destruction of the Cosmos (Aetius Ii 4.8). Phronesis 45 (1):1-18.
James Eric Butler (2005). Effluvia. Epoché 9 (2):215-231.
Added to index2009-06-27
Total downloads19 ( #71,234 of 722,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?