Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):272-273 (1998)
|Abstract||The effort to understand speech perception on the basis of relationships between acoustic parameters of speech sounds is to be recommended. Neural specializations (combination-sensitivity) for echolocation, communication, and sound localization probably constitute the common mechanisms of vertebrate auditory processing and may be essential for speech production as well as perception. There is, however, no need for meaningful maps.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Howard C. Nusbaum, Jeremy I. Skipper & Steven L. Small (2001). A Sensory-Attentional Account of Speech Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):995-996.
Bob McMurray & David Gow (2005). It's Not How Many Dimensions You Have, It's What You Do with Them: Evidence From Speech Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):31-31.
Li Deng (1998). Locus Equation and Hidden Parameters of Speech. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):263-264.
Robert Sparrow (2004). Censorship and Freedom of Speech. In Healy (ed.), Censorship and Free Speech. The Spinney Press.
Robert E. Remez (1998). Listening to Speech in the Dark. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):281-282.
Irene Appelbaum (1998). Fodor, Modularity, and Speech Perception. Philosophical Psychology 11 (3):317-330.
Yasuki Hashimoto & Kuniyoshi L. Sakai (2003). Brain Activations During Conscious Self-Monitoring of Speech Production with Delayed Auditory Feedback: An fMRI Study. Human Brain Mapping 20 (1):22-28.
Irene Appelbaum (1999). The Dogma of Isomorphism: A Case Study From Speech Perception. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):S250-S259.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?