David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 107-126 (2013)
Developments over the past four decades have secured Immanuel Kant’s status as being for contemporary philosophers what the sea was for Swinburne: the great, gray mother of us all. And Kant mattered as much for the classical American pragmatists as he does for us today. But we look back at that sepia-toned age across an extended period during which Anglophone philosophy largely wrote Kant out of its canon. The founding ideology of Bertrand Russell and G.E. Moore, articulating the rationale and fighting faith for the rising tide of analytic philosophy, was forged in a recoil from the perceived defects of a British idealism inspired by Hegel. Mindful of the massive debt evidently and self-avowedly owed by Hegel to Kant, and putting aside neo-Kantian readings of Kant as an empiricist philosopher of science that cast him in a light they would have found more favorable, Russell and Moore diagnosed the idealist rot as having set in already with Kant. For them, and for many of their followers down through the years, the progressive current in philosophy should be seen to have run directly from Locke, Leibniz, and Hume, to Mill and Frege, without any dangerous diversion into the oxbow of German idealism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sally Sedgwick (ed.) (2000). The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Cambridge University Press.
Brian O'Connor & Georg Mohr (eds.) (2006). German Idealism: An Anthology and Guide. University of Chicago Press.
Gary Banham (2003). Kant and German Idealisms. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):333 – 339.
Robert Hanna (2008). Kant in the Twentieth Century. In Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy. 150-203.
Paul Franks & Sebastian Gardner (2002). From Kant to Post-Kantian Idealism. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):211 - 246.
H. G. Callaway (1996). Schelling and the Background of American Pragmatism:. [REVIEW] Arisbe, Peirce-Related Papers 1:1-12.
Tom Rockmore (2007). On Reading Hegel. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (1):55-66.
Robert B. Pippin (1989). Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Tom Rockmore (2004). Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. Yale University Press.
Karl Ameriks (ed.) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
William Desmond, Ernst-Otto Jan Onnasch & Paul Cruysberghs (eds.) (2004). Philosophy and Religion in German Idealism. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads72 ( #58,721 of 1,902,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #280,997 of 1,902,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?