David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
AI and Society 28 (2):189-198 (2013)
The so-called new economy based on the global network of digitalized communication was welcomed as a platform of innovations and as a vehicle of advancement of democracy. The concept of virtuality captures the essence of the new economy: efficiency and free access. In practice, the new economy has developed into an heterogenic entity dominated by practices such as propagation of trust and commitment to standards and standard-like technological solutions; entrenchment of locally strategic subsystems; surveillance of unwanted behavior. Five empirical cases within the present field of opposing forces serve as fuel for reflection: football hooliganism, sand-boxing, digital vulnerability of nuclear technology, sensitivity of studio projects, and streamlining academic computing. The main argument of the article is that a historic re-materialization is taking place within the new economy. This means cognitive as well as material divisions. Incommensurability in science is comparable with product incompatibility from the point of view of their implications to the users of knowledge and computers. Hype and banal attached to the new media are related to two ways of assessing social capital: as a means of peaceful functionality or a condition for cultural conflicts. The paper ends in proposing that there is a re-materialization of the virtual now taking place especially on the meta-level of the system
|Keywords||Re-materialization Virtual New economy Democracy Commodification|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
S. Brown (2002). Michel Serres: Science, Translation and the Logic of the Parasite. Theory, Culture and Society 19 (3):1-27.
Michael Halewood (2011). A.N. Whitehead and Social Theory: Tracing a Culture of Thought. Anthem Press.
Bruno Latour (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Telmo Pievani & Giuseppe Varchetta (2005). Complexity, Evolution, and Creativity in New Management Theories or, in Other Words, What is the Connection Between an Immune System Network and a Corporation? World Futures 61 (5):370 – 377.
Roberto Diodato (2012). Aesthetics of the Virtual. State University of New York Press.
Neil Levy (2002). Virtual Child Pornography: The Eroticization of Inequality. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (4):319-323.
John L. Pollock (2008). What Am I? Virtual Machines and the Mind/Body Problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):237–309.
Ashley John Craft (2007). Sin in Cyber-Eden: Understanding the Metaphysics and Morals of Virtual Worlds. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 9 (3):205-217.
Beth Coleman (2011). Hello Avatar. Mit Press.
Izabela Bondecka-Krzykowska (2012). Uwagi na temat ontologii wirtualnej rzeczywistości. Filozofia Nauki 4.
Robert Scott Stewart & Roderick Nicholls (2002). Virtual Worlds, Travel, and the Picturesque Garden. Philosophy and Geography 5 (1):83 – 99.
Peter Horsfield (2003). Continuities and Discontinuities in Ethical Reflections on Digital Virtual Reality. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 18 (3 & 4):155 – 172.
Added to index2012-05-31
Total downloads4 ( #198,584 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?