David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Article distinguishes generally between offensive and defensive forms of partisan gerrymandering, argues that the latter form is a greater democratic harm, and explains that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Vieth v. Jubilirer thus had an overlooked bright side. Offensive gerrymandering is aimed at making re-election more difficult for the opposition party incumbents, whereas defensive gerrymandering is aimed at making re-election more assured for one's own party incumbents. The Article explains that the political dynamics of redistricting are such that restriction of one form of gerrymandering leads to a larger measure of the other form. The Court's refusal in Vieth to restrict offensive gerrymandering - the less harmful form between the two and the only one presented for judicial consideration - therefore had a beneficial effect, a bright side. A contrary decision in Vieth to restrict offensive gerrymandering likely would have led to even more defensive gerrymandering and greater entrenchment of incumbents on both sides of the aisle. The Article then closes with observations about the role of national party leadership in the Vieth re-redistricting of Texas and other offensive partisan gerrymanders.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Clifton Perry (2010). Political Gerrymandering and Truly Reflecting the Body Politic. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):185-195.
Carlos L. Yordán (2006). America's Quest for Global Hegemony: Offensive Realism, the Bush Doctrine, and the 2003 Iraq War. Theoria 53 (110):125-157.
Mehmet Bac & Parimal Kanti Bag (2002). Committee Decisions with Partisans and Side-Transfers. Theory and Decision 52 (3):267-286.
William Rehg & Darin Davis (2003). Conceptual Gerrymandering? The Alignment of Hursthouse's Naturalistic Virtue Ethics with Neo-Kantian Non-Naturalism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):583-600.
Joe E. Barnhart (1982). Goodness, God, and Theological Gerrymandering. Philosophical Topics 13 (Supplement):31-37.
Lisa M. Rasmussen (2006). Engineering, Gerrymandering and Expertise in Public Bioethics. HEC Forum 18 (2):125-130.
Aman Liev McLeod, The Red-Blue Divide on the Bench: An Examination of the Effects of Selection Systems on Partisan Divisions in State Supreme Court Decisions.
Darin Davis (2003). Conceptual Gerrymandering? Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):583-600.
Roberto Casati (2001). Cognitive Aspects of Gerrymandering. Topoi 20 (2):203-212.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #306,128 of 1,088,384 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?