David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (2):109 - 158 (1994)
In this paper, I show that the availability of what some authors have called the weak reading and the strong reading of donkey sentences with relative clauses is systematically related to monotonicity properties of the determiner. The correlation is different from what has been observed in the literature in that it concerns not only right monotonicity, but also left monotonicity (persistence/antipersistence). I claim that the reading selected by a donkey sentence with a double monotone determiner is in fact the one that validates inference based on the left monotonicity of the determiner. This accounts for the lack of strong reading in donkey sentences with MON determiners, which have been neglected in the literature. I consider the relevance of other natural forms of inference as well, but also suggest how monotonicity inference might play a central role in the actual process of interpretation. The formal theory is couched in dynamic predicate logic with generalized quantifiers.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jon Barwise & Robin Cooper (1981). Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Gennaro Chierchia (1992). Anaphora and Dynamic Binding. Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (2):111--183.
Henriëtte de Swart (1996). Quantification Over Time. In J. van der Does & Van J. Eijck (eds.), Quantifiers, Logic, and Language. Stanford University
P. T. Geach (1965). On Complex Terms. Journal of Philosophy 62 (1):5-8.
P. T. Geach (1962/1968). Reference and Generality. Ithaca, N.Y.,Cornell University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Emmanuel Chemla, Vincent Homer & Daniel Rothschild (2011). Modularity and Intuitions in Formal Semantics: The Case of Polarity Items. Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (6):537-570.
Edward Keenan & Denis Paperno (2010). Stanley Peters and Dag Westerståhl: Quantifiers in Language and Logic. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (6):513-549.
Adrian Brasoveanu (2013). The Grammar of Quantification and the Fine Structure of Interpretation Contexts. Synthese 190 (15):3001-3051.
Shalom Lappin & Nissim Francez (1994). E-Type Pronouns, I-Sums, and Donkey Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (4):391 - 428.
Scott Martin & Carl Pollard (2012). A Higher-Order Theory of Presupposition. Studia Logica 100 (4):727-751.
Similar books and articles
Michael Freund & Daniel Lehmann (1994). Nonmonotonic Reasoning: From Finitary Relations to Infinitary Inference Operations. Studia Logica 53 (2):161 - 201.
Jan Eijck & Fer-Jan Vries (1992). Dynamic Interpretation and HOARE Deduction. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (1):1-44.
Gilad Ben-Avi & Yoad Winter (2003). Monotonicity and Collective Quantification. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (2):127-151.
Bart Geurts (2002). Donkey Business. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (2):129-156.
B. Geurts (2005). Monotonicity and Processing Load. Journal of Semantics 22 (1):97-117.
Jouko Väänänen & Dag Westerståhl (2002). On the Expressive Power of Monotone Natural Language Quantifiers Over Finite Models. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):327-358.
Yoad Winter (2003). Monotonicity and Collective Quantification. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (2):127-151.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #104,520 of 1,699,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #128,702 of 1,699,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?