Religious Studies 27 (1):105-120 (1991)
|Abstract||It is said that faith in a divine agent is partly an attitude of trust; believers typically find assurance in the conception of a divine being's will, and cherish confidence in its capacity to implement its intentions and plans. Yet, there would be little point in trusting in the will of any being without assuming its ability to both act and know, and perhaps it is only by assuming divine omniscience that one can retain the confidence in the efficacy and direction of divine agency that has long been the lure of certain religious traditions|
|Keywords||Agency Intention Metaphysics Omniscience|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tomis Kapitan (1994). The Incompatibility of Omniscience and Intentional Action: A Reply to David P. Hunt. Religious Studies 30 (1):55 - 66.
Douglas P. Lackey (1984). Divine Omniscience and Human Privacy. Philosophy Research Archives 10:383-391.
Stamatios Gerogiorgakis (2011). Omniscience in Łukasiewicz's, Kleene's and Blau's Three-Valued Logics. Polish Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):59-78.
Daniel Diederich Farmer (2010). Defining Omniscience. Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):306-320.
Jason A. Beyer (2004). A Physicalist Rejoinder to Some Problems with Omniscience; or, How God Could Know What We Know. Sophia 43 (2).
Laura L. Garcia (1993). Timelessness, Omniscience, and Tenses. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:65-82.
William Lane Craig (2000). Omniscience, Tensed Facts and Divine Eternity. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):227--228.
Thomas Metcalf (2004). Omniscience and Maximal Power. Religious Studies 40 (3):289-306.
David P. Hunt (1996). The Compatibility of Omniscience and Intentional Action: A Reply to Tomis Kapitan. Religious Studies 32 (1):49 - 60.
Rik Peels (forthcoming). Is Omniscience Impossible? Religious Studies.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #49,521 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?