Faith and Philosophy 6 (2):207-214 (1989)
|Abstract||Philip E. Devine has presented insightful proposals for defining religion in his essay “On the Definition of Religion” (Faith and Philosophy, July 1986). But despite his illuminating discussion, particularly the treatment of borderline cases, his account fails to distinguish religion as a process or goal-oriented activity from religion as a body of doctrine, and is mistaken (or perhaps unclear) in its proposal that religion per se is committed to the existence of superhuman agents. These deficiencies are exposed herein, and a sketch of an alternative view of religion, inspired by the views of both William James and Josiah Royce, is set forth|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Phillip E. Devine (1986). On the Definition of “Religion”. Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):270-284.
Wai Yip Wong (2011). Defining Chinese Folk Religion: A Methodological Interpretation. Asian Philosophy 21 (2):153 - 170.
Keith Ward (2006/2007). Is Religion Dangerous? William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
Shane R. Cudney (1999). “Religion Without Religion”. Faith and Philosophy 16 (3):390-404.
Jan Platvoet & Arie L. Molendijk (eds.) (1999). The Pragmatics of Defining Religion: Contexts, Concepts, and Contests. Brill.
Arie L. Molendijk & Peter Pels (eds.) (1998). Religion in the Making: The Emergence of the Sciences of Religion. Brill.
D. Z. Phillips & Timothy Tessin (eds.) (1999). Religion and Hume's Legacy. St. Martin's Press, Scholarly and Reference Division.
Joseph Dabney Bettis (1969). Phenomenology of Religion. New York, Harper & Row.
Frederic Spiegelberg (1948). The Religion of No-Religion. Stanford, Calif.,J. L. Delkin.
Philip E. Devine (1996). Creation and Evolution. Religious Studies 32 (3):325 - 337.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads1 ( #277,212 of 556,776 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,776 )
How can I increase my downloads?