Devine on Defining Religion
Faith and Philosophy 6 (2):207-214 (1989)
| Abstract | Philip E. Devine has presented insightful proposals for defining religion in his essay “On the Definition of Religion” (Faith and Philosophy, July 1986). But despite his illuminating discussion, particularly the treatment of borderline cases, his account fails to distinguish religion as a process or goal-oriented activity from religion as a body of doctrine, and is mistaken (or perhaps unclear) in its proposal that religion per se is committed to the existence of superhuman agents. These deficiencies are exposed herein, and a sketch of an alternative view of religion, inspired by the views of both William James and Josiah Royce, is set forth | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Phillip E. Devine (1986). On the Definition of “Religion”. Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):270-284.
Wai Yip Wong (2011). Defining Chinese Folk Religion: A Methodological Interpretation. Asian Philosophy 21 (2):153 - 170.
Keith Ward (2006/2007). Is Religion Dangerous? William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
Shane R. Cudney (1999). “Religion Without Religion”. Faith and Philosophy 16 (3):390-404.
D. Z. Phillips & Timothy Tessin (eds.) (1999). Religion and Hume's Legacy. St. Martin's Press, Scholarly and Reference Division.
Joseph Dabney Bettis (1969). Phenomenology of Religion. New York, Harper & Row.
Frederic Spiegelberg (1948). The Religion of No-Religion. Stanford, Calif.,J. L. Delkin.
Philip E. Devine (1996). Creation and Evolution. Religious Studies 32 (3):325 - 337.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads1 ( #277,212 of 556,776 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,776 )How can I increase my downloads? |

