David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 50 (4):549-577 (1983)
Is Bayesian decision theory a panacea for many of the problems in epistemology and the philosophy of science, or is it philosophical snake-oil? For years a debate had been waged amongst specialists regarding the import and legitimacy of this body of theory. Mark Kaplan had written the first accessible and non-technical book to address this controversy. Introducing a new variant on Bayesian decision theory the author offers a compelling case that, while no panacea, decision theory does in fact have the most profound consequences for the way in which philosophers think about inquiry, criticism and rational belief. The new variant on Bayesian theory is presented in such a way that a non-specialist will be able to understand it. The book also offers new solutions to some classic paradoxes. It focuses on the intuitive motivations of the Bayesian approach to epistemology and addresses the philosophical worries to which it has given rise.
|Keywords||Decision making Knowledge, Theory of Science Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$177.99 used $435.82 new Amazon page|
|Call number||BD184.K37 1996|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Martin Smith (2010). What Else Justification Could Be. Noûs 44 (1):10 - 31.
Lara Buchak (2013). Belief, Credence, and Norms. Philosophical Studies (2):1-27.
Declan Smithies (2012). The Normative Role of Knowledge. Noûs 46 (2):265-288.
James M. Joyce (2010). A Defense of Imprecise Credences in Inference and Decision Making1. Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):281-323.
James M. Joyce (2005). How Probabilities Reflect Evidence. Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):153–178.
Similar books and articles
Ellery Eells (1984). Causal Decision Theory. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:177 - 200.
Frank Arntzenius (2008). No Regrets, Or: Edith Piaf Revamps Decision Theory. Erkenntnis 68 (2):277-297.
Frederic Schick (1997). Making Choices: A Recasting of Decision Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Darren Bradley (2013). Decision Theory, Philosophical Perspectives. In Hal Pashler (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Mind. Sage
Mark Sargent (2009). Answering the Bayesian Challenge. Erkenntnis 70 (2):237 - 252.
Patrick Maher (2010). Bayesian Probability. Synthese 172 (1):119 - 127.
Igor Douven (2002). Decision Theory and the Rationality of Further Deliberation. Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):303-328.
Michael J. Shaffer (2009). Decision Theory, Intelligent Planning and Counterfactuals. Minds and Machines 19 (1):61-92.
Martin Peterson (2009). An Introduction to Decision Theory. Cambridge University Press.
John Shoemaker (2003). Epistemological Naturalism and Mark Kaplan's Decision Theory. Philo 6 (2):249-262.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads132 ( #26,803 of 1,790,294 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #59,391 of 1,790,294 )
How can I increase my downloads?